Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IV. COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br />Initial suggestions for system improvements to <br />compensate for sustained operation of the "check" structure <br />and bypass channel were made by the OMID staff and were <br />reviewed by representatives of the Colorado River Water <br />Conservation District, Colorado Water Conservation Board, and <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The Grand Junction Projects <br />Office of the Bureau prepared appraisal-level cost estimates <br />for the following features (See Figure 3): <br /> <br />- An auxiliary pumping plant, located adjacent to the <br />forebay of the existing plant, housing four electric <br />pumps. Two pumps are sized to lift 12 cfs 41 feet to <br />Orchard Mesa Canal '1 (low lift units) and two pumps <br />lift 10 cfs 123 feet to Orchard Mesa Canal '2 (high <br />lift units). ~he pumping duration is assumed to be <br />60 days per year and power will be purchased at <br />prevailing rates. <br /> <br />- The existing earth bypass channel, located parallel <br />to and east of the Colorado River, conveys water from <br />the tailrace at the south to the river at the north <br />when the existing radial gate check in the tailrace <br />is closed. The channel is about 1520 feet long and <br />has an average depth of cut of about 13 feet. The <br />prism will be restored to the original shape which <br />had a bottom width of 20 feet and a 1:1 side slope. <br />Channel discharge was assumed to be 650 cfs. Costs <br />of relocating Public Service Company's 13.2 kv <br />transmission line are included in the estimate. <br /> <br />- An earth dike, 370 feet long with a maximum height of <br />11 feet, will be constructed along the east bank of <br />the river at the north end of the bypass channel. <br />The dike will have a top width of 20 feet, riprap on <br />the river side, and will be fitted with a radial gate <br />structure to hold out the river. <br /> <br />Tables 3 and 4 present detailed cost estimates for the <br />described improvements. Table 5 contains annualized cost <br />information, including operation, maintenance, and replacement <br />costs associated with the project. <br /> <br />The Bureau points out that there is very little <br />information available about performance of the OMID hydraulic <br />pumps under varying tailwater elevations, and that small <br />variations in performance under different "check" operations <br />can have major impacts on the pumping rates required from the <br /> <br />- 14 - <br />