Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001&85 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />This is the eighth report in a series that describes the charac- <br />teristics of streamflow in Kansas. The report defines the <br />channel characteristics of streams for in-channel flow based on <br />the relations between selected hydraulic-geometry parameters and <br />discharge developed at 117 gaging stations in Kansas and parts of <br />adjoining states (Figure 1). These relations may have limited <br />immediate value, but will be extremely useful in future analyses <br />of the relation of mean annual runoff to hydraulic geometry, the <br />relation of peak discharge to hydraul ic geometry, and the <br />extension of discharge ratings on the basis of hydraulic geometry. <br /> <br />Channel characteristics of natural streams constitute an inter- <br />dependent system that can be described by a series of graphs having <br />a simple geometric form. Graphs of the three parameters width, <br />depth, and velocity, as functions of discharge at the cross section, <br />constitute a part of what Leopold and Maddock (1953) in a pioneering <br />report called the hydraulic geometry of stream channels. <br /> <br />Leopold and Maddock showed that when discharges are of equal <br />frequency at different points on a river, the width, depth, and <br />velocity increase in a downstream direction. By using equations <br />to determine the discharge for selected frequencies and the state- <br />wide relations of the parameters with discharge, the expected <br />channel geometry for any location on streams can be determined. <br />Also, the reaeration coefficient of the stream can be computed, which <br />is useful in planning for recreation and other water activities. <br /> <br />This report has been prepared as a part of the cooperative program <br />for water resources investigations in Kansas between the Kansas <br />Water Resources Board, Keith S. Krause, Executive Director, and the <br />U.S. Geological Survey, Charles W. Lane, District Chief. The <br />State Geological Survey of Kansas, Frank C. Foley, and William W. <br />Hambleton, successive Directors, provided the funds for the use <br />of the computer at the University of Kansas Computation Center, <br />P. J. Wolfe, Director. <br /> <br />2 <br />