Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />c.' ,:'.-1.- <br />~"~"'/d"r <br />~ - -'.-'~ <br />. ~ <br />!../ "'~ <br />~.J"'II'''~' . <br />'~~-/f;' <br /> <br />UNITED STATES <br />CEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR <br />OFFICE' OF THE SECRETARY <br />WASHINGTON 25. C. c.; <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />December 17, 1963 <br /> <br />\ <br />y <br /> <br />LETTER TO CHAIRMEN JACKSON AND ASPINALL, COMKITTEES ON INTERIOR AND <br />IllSULAR AFFAIRS, SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, RESPEctIVELY <br /> <br />flear Mr'. Chairman: <br /> <br />The attached Report on Financial POSition, Missouri River Basin <br />Project, December- 1963, summarizes the project's legal and financial <br />background, the origin of the problems with which we are now faced, <br />and sets forth the results of an analysis based, upon principles and <br />criteria reco~.nded for adoption for the future, Before discussing <br />these items, howe'Ver, it' appears appropriate to set forth the overall <br />economic situation in the Missouri River basin, the outlook for the <br />future, and our ideas as to the appropriate role of the Government. <br /> <br />The Missouri River basin, as it will be discussed in this letter, <br />occupies about one-fifth of the land area of the forty-eight <br />conterminous statu and is comprised of all orparta of 10 states, <br />Seven of these states, Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, <br />North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming, are so-called Recl~tion <br />states and, as such, contain portions of the authorized plan of <br />water resource development known as the Missouri River Basin Project. <br />The States of Iowa and Minnesota are conSidered as parts of the <br />project area for power marketing purposes although they are 'not <br />included among the states in which the Bureau of Reclamation otherwise <br />operates, <br /> <br />Major regions within the Missouri River Basin Project area have been <br />subject to continuous relative economic decline for more than forty <br />years. Total population growth has not kept pace with national <br />trends and, in certain basin States, is net appreciably greater than <br />forty years age. Opportunity for youth is limited, and many of the <br />young men and women migrate from the basin or to the few major urban <br />centsra within the area. Most of the small towns are growing smaller, <br />and sOllIe have ciiuppured entirely. 'the nlllllber of farm f8llliliea has <br />declined, and per capita income has not increased commensurately with <br />other sectors of the economy. The, States of North Dakota and . <br />South Dakota illustrate basin-wide economic trende for this predominantly <br />agricultural srea. In these two States the combined change in popula- <br />tion from 1920 to 1960 has amounted to an overall growth of less than <br />three percent. against. a national growth of lIICre than 70 pereent. In <br />like manner, per capita income statistic. show that the agricultural <br />States fall below national averages by amounts ranging from 6 to 30 <br />percent. <br /> <br />