Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O()D8J~ <br /> <br />tine they commenced development or if they did not reali7.e <br />supplies were inadequate to serve both Indian and non-Indian <br />users. <br /> <br />Justice Departnent officials conversely believe that the <br />Federal Governnent should not pay for rights it already owns. <br />One State official said that the transfer of water fron <br />existing users to satisfy Indian clai~s would destroy the <br />investments made by current water users. He believes a <br />more logical approach night be to co~pensate the Indians <br />rather than existing users for the loss of water rights. <br /> <br />Several Indian tribes in the basin are claiming Winters <br />rights to large quantities of Colorado River water orar~ <br />claiming Colorado River water to satisfy claimed Winters <br />rights in other streams. ~hese tribes contend that the <br />Federal Government failed to protect their water rights <br />and has allowed the basin States to allocate their share <br />of the water to other users. Examples of Indian Winters <br />doctrine clai~s in the basin are listed in appendix VII. <br /> <br />The amount of Federal reserved <br />water r~~~Jains_is un~ertain <br /> <br />The reservation doctrine applied in the Winters case <br />was thought to be a special rule of Indian law as late as <br />1963 when, in Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963), <br />the Supreme Courtreaffirmed theVIability of the reservation I: <br />doctrine and specifically applied it to Federal reservations. <br />The Court upheld U.S. claims to Colorado River water and sone I <br />, <br />of its tributaries for use on non-Indian Federal reservations. <br /> <br />National forests, national parks, Federal rangelands, <br />military establishments, and fish and wildlife refuges are <br />examples of Federal reservations to which this doctrine <br />applies. These Federal reservations and federally owned <br />lands comprise the majority of the landholdings in the <br />Colorado River Rasin (60 percent in the Upper Basin and <br />52 percent in the LmJer Basin). <br /> <br />Depending on several factors, the amount of reserved <br />water for Federal lands could vary significantly. The <br />reservation doctrine reserves that anount of appurtenant, <br />then-unappropriated water needed to accomplish the purpose <br />of the reservation. The amount of Federal reserved water <br />for consumptive and nonconsumptive uses has not been iden- <br />tified. Although about 61 percent of all surface water in <br />the 11 Western StAtes originates on Federal reservations, <br />the Public Land Law Review Comnission's 1967 final report <br />indicated that less than 1 percent of all surface water <br />used in these States is used on Federal lands. <br /> <br />16 <br />