My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09929
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:01:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin - General Publications
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/4/1979
Author
Comptroller General
Title
Colorado River Basin Water Problems - How to Reduce Their Impact - Report to the Congress of the United States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00079l <br /> <br />In 1948 the four Upper Basin States, plus Arizona, <br />entered into the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, which <br />apportioned rights to the Upper Basin water among the States. <br />The Boulder Canyon Project Act of 192B (43 U.S.C. 617) appor- <br />tioned 7.5 maf of the Lower Basin's allocation among the three <br />Lower Basin States; however, the States did not agree with the <br />amounts. After much controversy, the Suprene Court confirmed <br />the allocations in its Arizona v. California decree of 1964 <br />(376 U.S. 340). <br /> <br />In summary, as a result of the compacts, the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act, the Mexican Water Treaty, and the Supreme <br />Court decree, the Colorado River waters have been apportioned <br />as follows: <br /> <br />--Each sub-basin is entitled to consumptively use 7.5 <br />maf annually. <br /> <br />--In the Lower Basin the 7.5 maf was apportioned as <br />4.4 maf to California, 2.8 maf to Arizona, and 300,000 <br />acre-feet to Nevada. <br /> <br />--In addition, the Lower Basin has been allocated 1 naf <br />which has not been divided among the Lower Basin States. <br /> <br />--The Upper Basin's entitlement apportioned 50,000 acre- <br />feet to Arizona; the remainder of the 7.5 maf appor- <br />tioned 51.75 percent to Colorado, 11.25 percent to <br />New Mexico, 23 percent to Utah, and 14 percent to <br />Wyoming. <br /> <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />k <br /> <br />--Under the treaty with Mexico, the united States is <br />obligated to deliver 1.5 mar annually to Mexico. <br /> <br />--Five Indian reservations along the Colorado River <br />have a grant of rights to divert about 1 maf, to <br />be deducted from California and Arizona's entitle- <br />ment. <br /> <br />COMPETING NEEDS FOR WATER <br /> <br />Demands for water in both sub-basins have been mainly <br />for agricultural, municipal, and industrial use to serve the <br />mushrooming population, sustain the traditionally high <br />industrial growth rates, and support some of the Nation's <br />most fertile agricultural lands. Recently, demands have <br />increased for water to use in developing energy resources. <br />The Nation's largest reserves of coal, oil shale, tar sands, <br />and uranium are located in the Upper Basin. Development of <br />these resources will depend onnany factors, including <br />availability of water. Historical water use patterns may <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.