Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><-= <br />C() <br />~ <br /> <br />Smith Fork Project <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />.:;"\ <br />>;-"""; <br />.'.....:.. <br /> <br />--........ <br />-- <br /> <br />~- <br /> <br /> <br />- ~ <br /> <br />1*;"" l!lI ~~ <br /> <br />Crawford Dam and Reservoir <br /> <br />Clipper Canal <br /> <br />Clipper Canal feeds from Aspen Canal and rUlls to the <br />west a dista.nce of about 0.5 mile. The initial capacity of <br />the canal is (i0 cubic feet per second. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Early Hislory <br /> <br />Delta County, along with most of western Colorado1 was <br />originally inhabited by the Ute Indians. Early settlement <br />of the area was retarded by hostility between the Indians <br />and the immigrants. In ]881, a compromise agreement <br />was reached between the Federal Government and the <br />Ute Indians which required the Indians to locate in the <br />Uintah Heservation in the Territory of Utah. After this <br />agreement, settlement of the area progressed rapidly. <br />Most of the impetus of the initial settlement period was <br /> <br />provided by discoveries of rich deposits of gold, silver, <br />and other minerals in the mountainous areas near the <br />Continental Divide. Agricultural development proceeded <br />at a slower rate but was much more uniform and stable. <br />Farms were developed along the valleys, towns were <br />established near the mines and the agricultural com- <br />munities, and construction of railroads to the trade and <br />mining centers was begun. <br /> <br />Investigations <br /> <br />The Smith Fork Project was mentioned briefly in <br />Reclamation's basin-type report of March 1946 on the <br />Colorado River. In 1951, Reclamation issued a detailed <br />report on the Smith Fork Project as a supplement to the <br />1951 report on the Colorado River Storage Project and <br />participating projects. This second report, amended in <br />October 1953, was the basis on which the project was <br />authorized. <br />