Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />potential, releases during 1999 will be planned to minimize large fluctuations in the daily and <br />monthly flows in the Gunnison River below the Uncompahgre Tunnel Diversion. <br /> <br />Navajo Reservoir <br /> <br />The April through July unregulated inflow into Navajo Reservoir in water year 1998 was <br />639 MCM (0.518 MAF) or 76 percent of average. Water year 1998 regulated inflow was <br />1,046 MCM (0.848 MAF) or 85 percent of average. Navajo Reservoir did not fill in 1998. <br /> <br />Section 7 consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service on the operation of Navajo Dam <br />continued in 1998. Water year 1997 was the seventh year of a seven-year study to evaluate <br />alternative operations of Navajo Reservoir to benefit endangered fish, and a biological opinion <br />on the operation of Navajo Dam is expected in 1999. During the spring large releases of up to <br />142 cms (5,000 cfs) were made during May and June to coincide with the peak flows of the <br />Animas River. This resulted in peak flows of223 cms (7,885 cfs) at Bluff, Utah. After the <br />completion of the large spring releases, releases were gradually reduced to approximately 17 crns <br />(600 cfs) for the remainder of the year. <br /> <br />In water year 1999, Navajo Reservoir is expected to nearly fill under the probable maximum <br />inflow scenario. The reservoir should fill above 8~0 percent of full under the moslProbable and <br />probable minimum scenarios. Releases from the reservoir will be held near 17 cms (600 cfs) <br />through the fall and winter months and large releases will likely be made in May and June in <br />order to improve the habitat and provide better spawning conditions for endangered fish in the <br />San Juan River. <br /> <br />Lake Powell <br /> <br />The April through July unregulated inflow into Lake Powell in water year 1998 was 10,639 <br />MCM (8.625 MAF) or 112 percent of average. Water year 1998 unregulated inflow was <br />16,850 MCM (13.660 MAF) or 116 percent of average. Lake Powell ended the water year <br />12 feet from full. <br /> <br />During water year 1999, releases greater than the minimum release objective of 10,152 MCM <br />(8.230 MAF) likely will be made to avoid anticipated spills and/or to equalize the storage <br />between Lakes Powell and Mead;1Jnderthe most probable inflow conditions, releases of 13,322 <br />MCM (10.800 MAF) would be made, while under the maximum probable inflow scenario, <br />approximately 21 ,340 MCM (17.300 MAF) will be released. This maximum probable inflow <br />would require releases of about 708 cms (25,000 cfs) for a lengthy period of time. With current <br />full reservoir system conditions, releases above powerplant capacity arelJossible in 1999. Such <br />releases would be made consistent with the 1956 Colorado River Storage Project Act, the 1968 <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act, the 1992 Grand Canyon Protection Act, and the Secretary Of~ <br />the Interior's agreement for managing spills from Glen Canyon Dam contained in the 1996, <br />1997, and 1998 AOP's. This agreement provides for the use of reservoir releases in excess of <br />power plant capacity required for dam safety purposes during high reservoir conditions to <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />o~ <br />."",*/ <br />,," <br /> <br />. ~ <br />(v-( <br />'~9~~o..';b <br />\;;;f/ <br />