My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09868
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:59:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin - General Publications
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1984
Author
Colo Div Water Resou
Title
A Literature Review of the Effect of Timber Cutting on Water Yield - State Engineer-Colorado Division of Water Resources
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ' <br />j <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />! <br />) <br />., <br />j <br /> <br />j <br />j. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />000662 <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />Wa tershed ~lanageJnent in the Central and Southern Rocky Mounta ins: <br />mar~ of status of our knowledge by vegetation types, by Charles <br />USV , 1-S, Rl>1-14Z, 1915. <br /> <br />The report summarizes ;J series of comprehensive reports during 40 or 50 <br />years (prior to 1975) on watershed management on five major vegetation types: <br />0) the coniferous forest subalpine zone, (2) the Front Range ponderosa pine <br />zone, (3) the Black Hi Us Ponderosa Pine zone, (4) the alpine zone, and (5) <br />the big sagebrush zone. The conclusions of the author are: <br /> <br />A sum- <br />F. Leaf, <br /> <br />1. Patchcutting subalpine forests results in significant redistribution <br />of winter snol>pack. Becallse more snow is deposi ted in the openings and less <br />in uncut forest, total storage on headwater basins is not changed. <br /> <br />2. <br />forest. <br />cutting. <br />and peak <br /> <br />Snowmelt in clearcut openings is more rapid than in the uncut <br />Streamflow is higher on the rising limb of hydrograph than before <br />When 50 percent of forest cut is in small openings, recession flows <br />flows are not changed appreciably. <br /> <br />3. In central Colorado when 40 percent of the watershed is occupied by <br />small openings, artnual water yields are increased by two inches. The decrease <br />in interception loss is almost compensated by the increase in evaporation loss <br />from snow surface. The recharge requi rement to the basin decreased by about <br />one inch and evapotranspiration during the growing season decreased by more <br />than 1.5 inches. <br /> <br />4. lI'ater yield increases averaged 3.5 inches due to timber cutting on <br />Fool Creek Watershed in Colorado. These runoff increases are tapering off <br />with time (I inch per 10 years, 1960-1970). <br /> <br />5. The pattern in which trees are cut determines whether or not runoff <br />will be increased. Streamflow increases are greatest when the forest is cut <br />in small openings. Water-yield increases are far less in case of clearcutting <br />when compared to patchcutting. II'hen the canopy density is reduced 50 percent <br />by selective cutting in spruce-fir forests on northerly aspects, water-yield <br />may actually be decreased. <br /> <br />(2) Forest ~mnagement for Increased Water Yield -- How useful in southenl <br />Alberta, by Charles R. Neill, Canadian Water Resources Journal, Vol. 5, <br />No.1, 1980. <br /> <br />The paper summarizes a study conducted for the Oldman Basin in Southern <br />Alberta and review of research results from the other regions of the \;orld. <br />The results of small basin studies are Slmunarized below based on Hibbert (35): <br /> <br />1. Reduct ion of forest <br />clearcutting or patchclltting. <br />50%). <br /> <br />cover generally increases \;ater )"ield, both for <br />Percentage increases are highly variable (5% to <br /> <br />2. The gain in yield declines as vegetation re-establishes, rapidly .,t <br />first and then more slowly. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />-.~""""'~;T" .".. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.