My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09858
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09858
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:58:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1970
Author
Unknown
Title
Questions and Answers
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />fulfilled by water available <br />ject, there would not be any <br />River. <br /> <br />from the Animas-La Plata Pro- <br />need for a call on the Animas <br /> <br />Remarks on comments. <br /> <br />Determination of city water rates must of necessity be an <br />ongoing process; a process which should be continuously <br />reviewed every few years and decisions made on water rates <br />today, mayor may not be applicable in the future. History <br />is a great teacher and the history of Grand Junction, Lamar <br />and other Colorado cities indicates that the failure to <br />take advantage of water supplies made available by water <br />resource development projects has been a mistake. The ques- <br />tion indicates that there is some concern regarding "cheaper <br />options", Cheaper options are not the only consideration. <br />Cheaper does not mean best, especially in the water business. <br />Availability on demand for example is much more important <br />than cost. The City of Durango had the opportunity to par- <br />ticipate in the Florida Project and turned down the opportun- <br />ity on the basis that the City of Durango had adequate water <br />at that time and that the water would be too expensive for <br />Durango's citizens. <br /> <br />The City Council should consider the fact that under the <br />Animas-La Plata the federal government will provide fifty <br />year financing at an interest rate of 6.59%. In addition, <br />there will be no payments during construction and a ten year <br />deferral under the Water Supply Act. The city will have <br />fifty years to pay costs which will eliminate any necessity <br />for city bonding. <br /> <br />LEGAL RELATIONSHIPS <br /> <br />1. WHAT WILL BE THE EFFECT OF AN ANIMAS-LA PLATA WATER CON- <br />SERVANCY DISTRICT UPON DURANGO'S EXISTING WATER RIGHTS? <br /> <br />There will be no direct impact on Durango's direct flow <br />rights on either the Florida or Animas Rivers. <br /> <br />Presuming construction of the Animas-La Plata Project and <br />an allocation to the City of Durango of 8200 acre feet of <br />storage under a storage decree owned by the Animas-La Plata <br />Water Conservancy District (1938 priority date), the City <br />of Durango would still have available for exchange or for <br />other utilization, such as raw water for summer irrigation, <br />the water rights which are presently owned by the City of <br />Durango in the Animas River. The trade-off seems to be <br />relatively poor direct flow water rights which the city <br />presently owns in the Animas River for 8200 acre feet of <br />priority storage right water which will be available to the <br />city on demand even though the Animas River may be at a very <br />low water supply stage. <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.