WSP09857 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 000124 Arizona law, In Nevada, the principal water users have established one organization to enter into interstate transactions on their behalf There are six entities in the State of California within the geographic service area of the Lower Basin that have the potential to become authorized entities, The information to be reported will be compiled by the authorized entities in the course oftheir normal business and the annual reports to the Regional Director will not impose any significant time or cost burden, It is estimated that each respondent would need one hour at a cost of $20 to complete the annual reporting requirement. . Regulatory Flexibility Act Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S,C. 601 et sea" to ensure that Government regulations do not unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities, The RF A requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule would have a significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a substantial number of small entities, An initial RF A analysis has been done, This Rule will not impose any direct costs on small entities, A benefit- cost analysis was completed and concludes that the Rule does not impose significant or unique impacts upon small governments (including Indian communities); or small entities such as water districts, water purveyors, water companies, or individuals authorized to beneficially use Colorado River water, . Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Adoption of 43 CFR part 414 will not result in any unfunded mandate to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $1 00 million or more in anyone year, . Federalism Assessment Under EO 12612, the Rule does not alter the relationship between the Federal government and the States under the BCP A or the Decree nor does it alter the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with this EO Reclamation has detennined that this Rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment. . Takings Implications Under EO 12630, the Rule does not represent a government action capable of interfering with constitutionally protected property rights, This Rule does not impose additional fiscal burdens on the public, This Rule would not result in physical invasion or occupancy of private property or substantially affect its value or use, The Rule would not result in any Federal action that would place a restriction on a use of private property, The Rule does not affect a Colorado River water contractor or Federal entitlement holder's right to use its full water entitlement. Under the Rule, an authorized entity may store unused water available from an entitlement holder's water rights 24