Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0031tJ8 <br />IV. TYPES OF PROTECTION <br /> <br />Legal schemes to provide area-of-origin protection can be divided <br />into three general categories: prohibition or severe restriction, alloca- <br />tion, and compensation. It is important to note that the approaches <br />taken in many of the states involve some mixture of methods from <br />among these categories. <br /> <br />A. Prohibition or Severe Restriclion <br /> <br />The most extreme form of protection is, of course, to prohibit any <br />transfer of water outside the basin of origin. Examples may be found <br />in most jurisdictions following the riparian doctrine and in the former <br />law of Nebraska. Examples of major restrictions on such transfers are <br />provided under the current law in Arizona and Montana. <br /> <br />I. Riparian Law <br /> <br />Riparian water law inherently provides built-in protection for the <br />watershed because water use is generally permitted only (a) on ripa- <br />rian land, by which is meant land alongside the watercourse, and (b) in <br />the watershed of origin.7 Furthermore, in contrast to the appropria- <br />tion doctrine, riparian law does not require water to be put to a benefi- <br />cial use in order to establish the water right. In general, the riparian <br />owner maintains an inchoate right to enjoy the benefits of water flow- <br />ing past his land. Thus, if a city such as New York desires to obtain <br />non riparian water, it must utilize its power of eminent domain and <br />pay for the property value taken.8 <br /> <br />2. The Nebraska Experience <br /> <br />In 1889 the Nebraska legislature enacted the following provision: <br />"The water appropriated from a river or stream shall not be turned or <br />permitted to run into the waters or channel of any other river or <br />stream than that from which it is taken or appropriated."9 An amend- <br />ment in 1893 added: "unless such stream exceeds in width one hun- <br />dred feet, in which event not more than seventy-five percent of the <br />regular flow shall be taken." 10 In 1895 the Nebraska legislature en- <br />acted some major changes in its water law which included the follow- <br />ing provision: <br /> <br />7. C. DAVIS, H. COBLENTZ & Q. TITELBAUM, WATERS & WATER RIGHTS ~ 614.1 (E.R. Clark <br />ed. '976). <br />8. In the ca..e of New York City, there is an additional statutory requirement which is discussed <br />below under compensation. See infra text accompanying nole 48. <br />9. 1889 Neb. Laws ch. 68. ~ 6. <br />ID. 1893 Neb. Laws ch. 40, 9 3 (codified as NEB. REV. STAT. ~ 46-206 (1984)) <br />