Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I'\) <br />C':) <br />o <br />w <br /> <br />~--. <br />\:.~-<: <br /> <br />, ~~~:':'v. <br /> <br />-...;..:: <br /> <br />REUSE OF AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE <br /> <br />107 <br /> <br />For simplicity, all projects along the river were assumed to be identical in <br />terms of resources, cropping patterns,technology, and cost. The differences <br />resulting from Strategies 1.11, and III implied in table 4 are assumed to be the <br />only ones that distinguish lhe farms along the river. <br />The economic evaluation was based on lhe following functions which <br />describe the long-term profit associated with the i-th farm activity under <br />strategy Ie, <br /> <br />[3] ",', = <br /> <br />J <br />i {[I_R',].y ,'(P.-H ).C-F ,'p.,w',,-p"r',,-p"d'..}, <br />y I IJ J J 'J IJ IJ IJ IJ <br />j <br /> <br />[4] 11' = :r",', - S(v.c), <br /> <br />where Jt',and 11' are the farm and regional profits, respectively; J, is lheset of <br />crops grown on farm i; f3', is the yield loss (fraction) for crop j due to salt <br />concentration in the applied irrigation water; y'j is the maximum yield level <br />available when crop j is irrigated with fresh water; Pj and Hj are crop yield price <br />and harvest cost associated with crop j, respectively; C'jand Fijare. respectively, <br />nonwater variable cost and fixed COSt for crop j; and p', p', and p' are, <br />respectively, water price, drainage disposal cost, and water reuse cost. The <br />lauer two water costs represent, respectively, additional costs associated with <br />the disposal ofthe drainage water (such as treatment, evaporation ponds, etc.). <br />and associated with reuse (such as cost of pumping, ponds for intermediate <br />storage, and monitoring). Note that all social costs tllat migllt result Crom <br />drainage disposal are included in the variable p'. The variables w'.., d'.., r'.., are <br />IJ IJ , <br />volume of applied freshwater, volume of disposed drainage water. and vOlume <br />of drainage applied for reuse, respectively. Note that the total amount oC <br />applied irrigation water on crop j in farm i under strategy k is w',- + r',.. The <br />variableS(v,c) is the regional (social) cost associated with the vOlJme olwater <br />, remaining in the river (v) and its salinity (c). Obviously, S is a decreasing <br />function ofv and an increasing function ofc. This topic falls beyond the scOpe <br />of the current analysis and will not be considered here. . <br />potential yield and crop yield prices used in the economic analysis are <br />presented in table 5 [or the [our crops. In ordcr to dctermine e[[ccts o[ the <br />different variables on single project and tOlal regional profit, a sensitivilY <br />analysiswasper[ormed with respect to these variables. RangcsoCvalues Cor p., <br />p', and p' were used to account fore[[ects of changes in water prices, drainage <br />disposal costs, and water reuse costs on the profitability of the three strategies. <br />For example, a zero value for p' was used where drainage disposal was not <br />considered to cause a problem to society; and high levels of p' wcre uscd to <br />account for the additional costs to make drainage disposal safe (pumping, <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br /> <br />" <br />