Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- l5 - <br /> <br />and lower chloride concentration of the San Miguel River, an arithmetic average <br />of 415 mg/l rise was noted in the chloride level of the combined stream (Station <br />US-14) as compared to the chloride level of the San Miguel River before mixing. <br />By contrast, the arithmetic average rise of chloride concentration in the San <br />Miguel River as it passed Uravan was 123 mg/l. <br /> <br />Sodium and chloride balances made around the confluence of the Dolores and <br />San Miguel Rivers gave excellent agreement for cycle I. For example, a total of <br />106,400 pounds/day of chlorides were found above the confluence (Stations DS-6 and <br />US-13), while 110,400 pounds/day were found below the confluence. This agreement <br />within five percent tends to show the consistency of the respective laboratory <br />analyses. <br /> <br />On the other hand, two considerations apparently affect the striking of a <br />similar material balance around the confluence during cycle II. Rain during the <br />second cycle resulted in a wide range of flow at Station US-6, as seen in Table <br />III. Using the average flow given there of 23 cfs, the resulting material balance <br />for chloride shows 666,000 pounds/day above the confluence against 196,000 pounds/ <br />day below as measured at Station US-14. An attempt was made to reconcile this dif- <br />ference by assuming the median flow for Station US-6, cycle II, to have been more <br />representative of flow conditions during the sampling period. This attempt gave a <br />value of 296,000 pounds/day of chlorides above the confluence compared to the <br />196,000 pounds/day below. This is not a satisfactory agreement. It is felt that <br />neither the sample taken nor the flow averages used is truly representative of <br />river conditions caused by the intense rain. The other factor that may affect <br />these results is not seen directly in these figures themselves. Station US-14 is <br />located twelve miles downriver from the confluence of the Dolores and San Miguel. <br />It seems likely that various chemical constituents could be leached from the soil <br />and carried away in the runoff from a heavy rain, thus affecting the concentration <br />measured in a composite sample of the kind that was taken from the river during <br />this survey. <br /> <br />Here, as in the Slick Rock area (Dolores River), all sulfate and total <br />dissolved solids concentrations in river samples were above recommended limits in <br />the U. S. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards. <br /> <br />Radiological <br /> <br />Most of the radium-226 analyses were performed by a private laboratory; the <br />remaining radium-226 and all the uranium analyses were done by colorado River Basin <br />Project personnel at the Public Health Service Occupational Health Field Station <br />in Salt Lake City. Gross radioactivity analyses were carried out by the Field <br />Operations Section, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center. <br /> <br />Data from radium-226 and uranium analyses of stream and effluent samples are <br />presented in Tables VIII and IX. Generally, levels of both radium-226 and uranium <br />are higher in the samples taken during cycle II than in those taken during cycle I. <br />For instance, in the San Miguel River above Uravan, the dissolved radium concen- <br />trations were 1.6 and 0.3 ~~g/l for cycle II and cycle I respectively; corresponding <br />dissolved uranium concentrations were 7.9 and 6.5 ~g/l. Calculated ratios of dis- <br />solved radium~226, cycle II, to dissolved radium-226, cycle I, in the stream samples <br />ranged, with one exception, from 1.1:1 to 1.6:1. Corresponding values for dissolved <br />