My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09829
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:56:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:58:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1989
Author
USGS
Title
Simulation of Streamflow in Small Drainage Basins in the Southern Yampa River Basin - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,1'\" '<13 <br />Ii" (. ~. <br /> <br />The major source of water in northwestern Colorado is the high-elevation <br />mountains east and south of the Yampa River valley. Water from these high <br />mountain areas flows through the more arid valley. In the past, streamflow- <br />gaging stations were operated on tributaries that drain the high mountain <br />areas and on the main stem of the -Yampa River. Streamflow gaging of tribu- <br />taries in the more arid valley virtually was ignored. - <br /> <br />Coal mining in the southern Yampa River basin generally is concentrated <br />in small drainage basins in the arid valley where there are few streamflow- <br />gaging stations. Mining companies and government agencies have been concerned <br />about the effects of mining on the water resources, and they also have been <br />concerned about the availability of water for mining-related activities and <br />other uses. However, because the tributaries in these small drainage basins <br />generally were ungaged and because streamflow characteristics can be derived <br />only after some years of measuring streamflow at appropriate sites, _a <br />streamflow-gaging program for the small drainage basins was needed to identify <br />these characteristics. Measurements made in one drainage basin may be useful <br />in answering questions about the water resource in that specific basin, but it <br />is not known whether these data would be useful or appropriate for other <br />similar drainage basins that are several miles away and for which no stream- <br />flow measurements are available. Therefore, a technique was needed to assess <br />the water- resources in gaged drainage basins and to provide a mechanism to <br />transfer these data to ungaged drainage basins. These capabilities are avail- <br />able in the Precipitation~Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) (Leaves ley and others, <br />1983). This modeling system enables an evaluation of the magnitude and <br />variability of the components of the water balance in the drainage basins <br />- monitored and provides some mechanism for transfer of hydrologic data. <br /> <br />This study was done in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Land Manage- <br />ment, which manages much of the Federal land and coal reserves in the study <br />area. The water-resource information is needed so that the U.S. Bureau of <br />Land Management can assess the effects of coal mining in the small drainage <br />basins. Therefore, the study was done to: (1) Determine drainage basin <br />characteristics and calibrate PRMS for simulating streamflow in drainage <br />basins monitored in the program, and (2) assess the transferability of model <br />parameters within the southern Yampa River basin. <br /> <br />The purposes of this report are to: <br /> <br />1. Describe the methods used in the study. <br />2. Describe the drainage basins monitored. <br />3. Describe the model results for these drainage basins. <br />4. Describe the applicability of the model to additional monitored <br />basins and to assess transferability of model parameters. <br /> <br />Three drainage basins were monitored in each of three hydrologic regions <br />in the study area. Two drainage basins in each region were used to calibrate <br />and verify PRMS and to assess hydrologic variability. The third drainage <br />basin in each region was not calibrated but was used to test the transfer- <br />ability of model parameters in the particular region. For all of the drainage <br />basins except one, period of record used for calibration and verification <br />included water years 1976-81. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />~.,-.' <br />,~,... <br />~:~f~ <br />~:~, <br />[~~ <br />~~~~ <br />::::q; <br />~~% <br />r~~ <br />;,;~.~.: <br />~~~ <br />.~ <br />~~f <br />~t~ <br />~';y,:. <br />ttf~ <br />~;:('>...:~ <br />~Mi;: <br />r....~ <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />....'.. <br />~~::~~ <br />ii.~ <br />~:;:~1! <br />~~~i{ <br />~~~ <br />;t.~~:: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />.~' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />,>-:':r. <br />.,,~'<... <br /> <br />"'.-. <br /> <br />i....:.. <br /> <br />.;.: <br /> <br />'.,,;.,;'; <br /> <br />;-:'..:' <br /> <br /> <br />; ""'~.~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.