Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0022.31 <br /> <br />.,,:-~ <br />:,~'~ ;'~. <br /> <br />:':<,' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Additional difficulty in predicting low streamflows may be the result of <br />a lack of appropriate algorithms in PRMS. The model does not include alluvial <br />aquifers or the transfer of water into or out of such an aquifer during low- <br />streamflow conditions. If this inclusion is an important component in causing <br />low streamflow, PRMS cannot duplicate the situation. The importance of allu- <br />vial aquifers or the transfer of water is unknown in the drainage basins <br />studied. PRMS assumes a closed system; therefore, it is difficult to simulate <br />ground-water source areas, influencing low streamflow, that are larger than <br />the basins being modeled. <br /> <br />)!:'.,'" <br />','," <br />~:';'-\ <br />:~:;;i <br />t:ii <br />~',;',: <br />:: :;"~., <br /> <br />'.',~ <br />,...,' <br /> <br /><:..-.: <br />',:::' <br />;'i:: <br />,;;';':-, <br /> <br />~:i> <br />~~.;: <br /> <br />Flow-duration curves provide a logical extension of the singular, statis- <br />tic, percent of days of zero streamflow. The flow-duration curve includes a <br />frequency of all streamflow values and not just the frequency of zero flow <br />days. Flow-duration curVes are shown for each of the s,ix streamflow-gaging <br />stations (figs. 3 through 8) for the period of record. <br /> <br />'.:--::::: <br />::~i <br />~~;;~~ <br />, !1-Y: <br />-,,:.'. <br />..:.'" <br />f~1j;: <br />, ~-.. <br /> <br />i <br />~J; <br />[!~ <br />I <br /> <br />~~i <br />i <br />~~ <br />;,,~ <br /> <br />fl, <br /> <br />:::I';--:;' <br />,:'~'X': <br />~,;::::,j <br />'f;t,~~: <br />;{;:":~ <br />/.<;::,] <br /> <br />The steep flow-duration curves indicate the ephemeral nature of the <br />streams, with the possible exception of Wilson Creek (fig. 7). Most simulated <br />flow-duration curves generally correspond to the observed curves; the corre- <br />spondence is greatest for the midrange streamflows. At high flows (less than <br />1 percent of the time that flow is equaled or exceeded); there is a deviation <br />of the simulated streamflow from the observed streamflow for most of the <br />drainage basins. For flows less than 1.0 ft3js, deviations of,the simulated <br />streamflow from the observed streamflow also tend to occur. These deviations <br />for the smaller streamflows have been described in the paragraphs above about <br />the zero-flow statistic. <br /> <br />Additional difficulty in predicting streamflow is indicated when the <br />water balance produced by the model is studied (table 7). In the water <br />balance, net precipitation is total precipitation minus losses from inter- <br />ception. Basin storage is the sum of all storage in the soil profile, the <br />subsurface reservoirs, and the ground-water reservoirs. In the overall water <br />balance, much of the net precipitation was lost to evapotranspiration. The <br />average loss for all drainage basins, for all years, was 96 percent. During <br />some years, evapotranspiration exceeded precipitation because water was <br />extracted from basin storage. Actual streamflow was a small component of <br />the water balance and streamflow comprised the remaining' 4 percent of net <br />precipitation. <br /> <br />Because streamflow is such a small percentage of the water balance, <br />substantial difficulty occurs when calibrating PRMS or any model for this <br />semiarid environment. The error generated when distributing the point values <br />of precipitation in time and space probably is larger than the annual volume <br />of streamflow. Furthermore, the error generated when predicting evapotrans- <br />piration values probably is larger than the annual volume of streamflow. Both <br />of these errors are combined in this analysis. Neither source of error can be <br />defined effectively without intensive data collection. In hydrologic regimes <br />where streamflow is a more substantial part of the water balance, errors in <br />precipitation distribution and evapotranspiration may not result in large <br />difficulties in calibration, but, in a semiarid region, such errors can easily <br />hinder streamflow prediction. <br /> <br />";"z:,;', <br /> <br />':~"::';:': <br />~.{;::.~~: <br />:~.:~':::; <br />::;~\~\, <br />~:t;'>,',:~ <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />" ,,~':, <br />~?>,;,;~ <br />A}{ <br />[t't: <br />~~~;~:: <br />;".,' <br />