Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />Ut <br />N <br />W <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />Adequate data are available for nine Reclamation, one BLM, <br />and eight USDA projects, which are included in the present <br />analys;s. All the project data is displayed in the Appendix <br />(TableiC-2). Several of these projects were given fixed <br />construction-start dates. <br /> <br /> <br />A summ~ry of projects and investment levels analyzed in the <br />model is ,shown in Table 3. The table indicates which pro- <br />jects .re included in the various investment or funding <br />assumptions ranging from $301 million to $703 million. The <br />"fixed'start" projects shown under each investment level <br />indicate ,those projects which are "fixed" in terms of <br />curren~ program commitments/constraints for construction or <br />implem~ntation. The remaining projects in the table are <br />flagge4 to indicate new construction starts and whether the <br />new st~rts under each investment level are delayed or acce- <br />lerate~ compared to the $570 million level. <br /> <br />;\! <br />,) <br />:; <br />','j <br /> i <br />,'J <br />,j <br />'J! <br />-,-~ <br />, 1 <br />"l <br />;1 <br />~ <br /> , <br />,"I- <br />ii!:.' <br />'1; <br />.;,t <br />;:~ <br />t <br />:; <br />:t <br /> , <br />'I <br />, <br />t <br />\, <br />;-:i <br />:~ <br />:J: <br />j <br />'oj <br /> , <br /> , <br />'~ <br /> <br />The salt load reductions, above those obtained to date, are <br />compar~d against the target reduction at two investment <br />levelsiand are shown in Figure 10. <br /> <br />In fig*re 10, the salt load reductions (not including <br />completed units) at two investment levels are compared <br />against the target reductions needed for the entire period <br />(1985-~020). Not only does the selected program investment <br />level have to meet the long-term reduction goal in 2010, but <br />also t~ provide assurance of remaining above the target <br />reduct~on requirements for the interim period. The target <br />reductions for the entire period of analysis are based on <br />averag~ hydrology for the basin which means that the numeric <br />criteria will be met 50 percent of the time. In the short <br />term (l9aS-199S), program reduction exceeds the minimum <br />target'requirement. However, any construction delays could <br />reduce1the probability of meeting short-term reduction <br />requir$ments as well as the ultimate salt load reduction in <br />2010. 'Of particular note is the increase in program invest~ <br />ment estimated in 1990. Any significant construction delay <br />at this critical development point (Paradox Valley Unit) <br />will make it difficult to meet the 1995 target level. <br /> <br /> <br />Risk and Uncertainty in Implementation <br /> <br />Salinity control is often viewed as both an enviromental- <br />pOllution control and water resources related program. In <br />either'case, it is considered a unique undertaking, <br />involving advanced computer modeling and other recently <br />develo~ed ground water control technolgies. Aside from the <br />basic technical risks involved, the basin wide program must <br /> <br />"'1 <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />,:1 <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />J <br />.A <br />.J <br />1 <br />~ <br />-i <br />3' <br />-~ <br />