Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />~ <br />CD <br />.;:;:. <br /> <br />interpret~tion by two independent contractors led to the <br />selection ~f a test well site. The well plan is complete <br />and land ~as been purchased for the test well. The solici- <br />tation/RPF (request for proposals) was prepared for the <br />15,400 foqt deep injection well using advance design <br />features to handle the high pressure and temperature corro- <br />sive brin~. Reclamation issued the RPF's for the well <br />drilling qn November 1, 1985. <br /> <br />The contract award for the well drilling is scheduled for <br />June 1986. The entire test well program is scheduled to be <br />completed by 1990. <br /> <br />Las Veqas :Wash Unit NV (BR) <br /> <br />The 3.5 m~le pittman bypass pipeline was completed and is in <br />operation. A monitoring program began June 20 to evaluate the <br />effectiveqess of the pipeline to prevent seepage. The <br />expected ~alt reduction of 7,000 tons per year is included <br />in data b~se. <br /> <br />Another strategy which may be cost-effective to further <br />reduce satinity loading is using ground water barriers in <br />selected areas of the Wash to develop a ground water deten- <br />tion basin system. Each detention basin would be formed by <br />a periphetal slurry trench/wall. An 8,000 foot perimeter <br />dike and ~lurry trench/wall will be constructed near the <br />Whitney a;ea (now part of East Las Vegas) to verify the <br />feasibility ~f this strategy. If a detention basin system <br />appears feasible after 2 years of monitoring, additional <br />basins may be built. The construction of ground water <br />detention!basins may accomplish the equivalent salinity <br />reduction'expected from the bypass channel for the same cost <br />with less,local opposition. The proposed Whitney <br />Verification program will also evaluate a vegetative test <br />site and involve other water quality monitoring activities <br />in the Wash. <br /> <br />McElmo Creek/Dolores proiect co (BR/USDA) <br /> <br />Reclamati9n's planning activities for the McElmo Creek Unit <br />were conc~uded with the passage of Public Law 98-569. <br />Salinity ~ontrol features will now be constructed under the <br />Dolores ptoject. <br /> <br />Supplements to the Definite Plan Report and Final <br />Environmental Statement of the Dolores Project will be <br />drafted in 1986 and 1987 for filing with EPA. Final appro- <br />val by th~ Commissioner of Reclamation is expected in the <br />spring of' 1988. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />.-..,4-a <br /> <br />, il <br />:; <br />1 <br />A <br />,;i <br />'..~ <br />'~ <br /> <br />,~.l <br />:~ <br />i <br />Ii <br />'-l! <br />",j <br />-~ <br />1 <br />'~ <br />., <br />1 <br />,'I <br />.~ <br />,~ <br />, 1 <br />ij <br />.J <br />i <br />'i <br />I <br />.~ <br />:~ <br />~ <br />',:i <br />'a <br />~~ <br />t <br />'- ~g <br />:0 <br />i <br />4 <br />'j <br />.~ <br />~ <br />! <br />',;1 <br />i <br />~ <br />"~ <br />Jj <br />'I <br />:,1 <br />,;1 <br />!3 <br />" <br />)} <br />.l <br />, <br />-~ <br />" <br />1 <br />1 <br />, <br />.J <br /> <br />~ <br />.l <br />'Ii <br />" <br />;W <br />" <br />3 <br />,i <br />'1 <br /> <br />~~ <br />.ii <br />, <br />~ <br />Ji <br />1 <br />, <br />% <br /> <br />~ <br />. <br />~ <br />I <br />i <br />~ <br /> <br />