Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 1.; - Cost-effectiveness Summary in Best Cost-effectiveness <br />drder (From Basic Data Table, Appendix A - 1984 Value$) <br /> <br />~ <br />.+:>. <br />(0 <br />~,) <br /> <br />, <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br />.~", <br /> <br />,;,.f4: <br /> <br />Uni~ <br /> <br />Onsite <br />Projected <br />Salt <br />Reduction <br /> <br />(kton/yr) <br /> <br />at proiect <br />Estimated <br />Salt <br />Reduction. <br />to Date <br />(kton/yr) <br /> <br />Area <br />Annual <br />Cost <br />Effec:t- <br />Ivenecss <br />($/to'n) <br /> <br /> <br />Meeker Dbme (BR) <br />. . ' <br />V1rg1n V~lley (USDA) <br />Las Vega~ Wash, Whitney (BR) 1/ <br />Lower Gu~nison, WW (BR) <br />Las Vega~ Wash, Stg II (BR) <br /> <br />Grand Valley (USDA) <br />Las Vega~ Wash, pittman (BR) 1/ <br />Big Sandy WSDA) <br />Paradox 'alley (BR) <br />Lower Gu*nison (USDA) <br /> <br />Moapa Valley (USDA) <br />Price-Sa* Rafael Rivers (BR) <br />Mancos V_lley (USDA) <br />Uinta Ba$in (USDA) <br />McElmo Creek (USDA) <br /> <br />Lower vitgin River (BR) <br />Uinta Ba.in Stage I (BR) <br />Dolores ~roject (BR) <br />Grand valley Stage Two (BR) <br />Dirty Devil River (BR) <br /> <br />Sinbad V4l1ey (BLM) <br />Glenwood+Dotsero Springs <br />Grand Valley Stage One (BR) <br />Lower Gudnison Stage I Balance (BR) <br />Grand Va~ley Stage Two Balance (BR) <br /> <br />Lower Gunnison N Fork (BR) <br />San Juan;River (BR) <br />uinta Ba~in Stage II (BR) <br />Price-Sari Rafael Rivers (USDA) <br />Big Sandy River (BR) <br />PVID (BR/USDA) <br /> <br />48.0 <br />37.2 <br />10.0 ~/ <br />74.3 <br />66.0 ~/ <br />230.0 <br />7.0 <br />52.9 <br />180.0 <br />335.0 <br />19.2 <br />22.0 <br />8.8 <br />82.6 <br />38.0 <br />270.0 <br />25.5 <br />23.4 <br />120.3 <br />20.6 <br />7.5 <br />287.0 <br />24.0 <br />66.3 <br />23.2 <br /> <br />48 1/ <br /> <br />27.3 <br />7 <br /> <br />15.6 <br /> <br />19.9 <br /> <br />14 <br />l6 <br />l6 <br />11 <br />l7 <br /> <br />d <br /> <br />", <br /> <br />, <br />'" <br /> <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />32 <br />32 <br /> <br />35 <br />47 <br />56 <br />59 <br />67 <br /> <br />"~ <br />. <br /> <br />-::1 <br />,~i- <br /> <br />69 <br />85 <br />89 <br />93 <br />97 <br /> <br />10l <br />109 <br />123 <br />l83 <br />297. <br /> <br />-4 <br />.1 <br />.~ <br />" <br />j <br /> <br />~ <br />,'-, :ii <br />"',- <1 <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />\1 <br /> <br />, <br />., <br /> <br />-~ <br />'j <br />I <br />, <br />- }; <br /> <br /> <br />1/ Stag~ I <br />2/ Best 'estimates at this time <br />1/ Cost 'effectiveness based on 19,000 tons <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />!,- <br /> <br />iE- <br /> <br />c<<_"- "< <br /> <br />,!,:'l <br />;l~l <br /> <br />_ __ _ ~ ^" .~,-"-~, "".~_fm <br />