Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY SHEET <br />Paradox Valley Unit <br />Colorado River Rasin Salinity Control Project <br /> <br />March 1980 <br />page'l of 2 <br /> <br />48-155 0.1-1.1 BRINE WELL <br /> FlELO AREA H. <br />20- 300 t <br />Length <br />(miles) <br />20.5 5 <br /> 5.26 <br />Radium Radium <br />~ Dike <br />87 56 <br />8,300 7,500 <br /> <br />LOCATION <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Paradox Valley Unit is located in Montrose <br />and San Nigul:!l Counties of southwestern Colo- <br />rado in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />PURPOSE <br /> <br />The unit is designed to reduce the introduction <br />of salt into the Colorado River through one of <br />its major tributaries, the Dolores River. A <br />wildlife area to mitigate losses of wildlife <br />would be developed. Also included is a cul- <br />tural resource program to collect and preserve <br />archaeological information. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The Paradox Valley Unit was authorized for con- <br />struction by the Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Act of June 24J 1974 (Public Law <br />93-320) . <br /> <br />A Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the <br />unit was filed in May 197B. A public hearing <br />on the draft statement was held in June 1978 <br />and the Final Environmental Impact Statement <br />was filed with EPA on March 20, 1979. The <br />Definite Plan Report was approved January 24, <br />1979. <br /> <br />The FY80 appropriations include $3,163,000 <br />to continue construction. <br /> <br />!Y>!i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The unit would be designed to reduce the <br />salinity of the Dolnres and COlorado Rivers <br /> <br />STATISTICS <br /> <br />PROJECT FEATURES <br /> <br />Depth <br />~ (feet) <br /> <br />Capacity <br />(ds) <br /> <br />Wells <br />Brine production wells 18 <br />Ground water <br />monitoring wells 68 <br /> <br />"Brine pipeline <br />Brine pipt!l1ne pumping <br />plartts <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dams (feet) <br />Heieht above streambed <br />Crest length <br />Evaporation Pond <br />Capacity (acre-feet) <br />Flood control <br />Inactive <br />Dead <br />Total <br />Surchar&e <br />Maximum water surface <br />area (acres) <br /> <br />3,750 <br /> <br />18,700 <br />62,060 <br />6,040 <br />86,800 <br />6,540 <br /> <br />by pumping brine" ground water from a well field <br />located along the Dolores River in Paradox <br />Valley and thus preventing it from surfacing in <br />the riverbed. A test woll field has already <br />been installed as part of a design data collec- <br />tion program, and other facilities required for <br />brine treatment and disposal would be added <br />during unit construction. <br /> <br />The brine would be piped from the well field to <br />a nearby hydrogen sulfide stripping plant, where <br />potentially toxic. and corrosive gas would be con- <br />verted into sulfur. An operational headquarters <br />would be constructed at the site of the strip- <br />ping plant. The treated brine and sulfur would <br />be piped from the stripping plant "to the pro- <br />posed Radium Evaporation Pond or deep well in- <br />jection site for disposal. The pond pond would <br />be located in Dry Creek Basin to the southeast <br />of the well field, and eight pumping plants <br />would be needed on the pipeline to lift the <br />brine over the divide between Paradox Valley <br />and the basin. The deep well injection alter- <br />native is being stud5.ed and well locations will <br />be determined i~ the future. <br /> <br />To reduce adverse impacts on wildlife, a wild- <br />life area would be developed near the evapora- <br />tion pond and other areas temporarily disturbed <br />by construction would be seeded with plant <br />species valuable as wildlife habitat. Since <br />the wildlife area was not included in the unit <br />plan when it was authorized, the approval of <br />the appropriate O:mgressional committees would <br />be required. Also included as part of tl~ unit <br />would be a cultural resource program to test <br />two sites located 'il'ithin the proposed evapora- <br />t ion pond. <br /> <br />This plan and the following statistics are <br />based on a required pumping rate of 5 cfs. It <br />is anticipated that further investigati.on will <br />indicate that a lower pumping rate could be. <br />used. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNTY <br />1 - -cou~ <br />\. . <br />. ~;y'Zjl. <br />~<il'" <br />RADIUM <br />EVAPONATION ~ Pompln. Pion' <br />POND ....Pl.. lln. <br /> <br />15 <br />