Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />.- "',"" <br />ud:;;~) <br /> <br />FIRST PERIOD <br /> <br />t <br /> <br /> <br />U2 <br /> <br />UPSTREAM <br />SITE <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />-J <br />U. <br />::;; <br /><{ <br />w <br />ex: <br />f0- <br />CI) <br /> <br />. DOWNSTREAM <br />,,/ <br />" SITE <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />UI <br /> <br />SECOND PERIOD <br /> <br />THIRD PERIOD <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />UNGAGED TRIBUTARY FLOW WAS <br />/ ASSUMED IN THE REACH, AS <br />INDICATED BY THIS PEAK. <br />THEREFORE, THIRD PERIOD WAS <br />,", NOT USED FOR ANAL YBIS. <br />., <br />. , <br />. , <br />. , <br />. , <br />. , <br />. , <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. '. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br />'.. <br /> <br />TIME, IN DAYS ~ <br />Figure 9. Example of selection of streamflow-event periods for analysis of daily streamflow gain and loss. <br /> <br />The statistical summary of daily estimates for <br />reach 2 (table 3) indicated that streamflow gains and <br />losses between -4.9 and 6.0 ft3/s were common during <br />all four seasons. Although large daily gains and losses <br />were computed (table 3), generally most of the values <br />were less than :1:20 percent of the daily mean stream- <br />flow. During winter, gain-and-Ioss computations were <br />made for 718 days, resulting in a daily median loss <br />of zero; during spring, gain-and-Ioss computatious <br />made for 736 days had a daily mediau gain of 2 ft3/s; <br />during summer, gain-and-Ioss computations made for <br />752 days had a daily median loss of I ft3/s; and during <br />fall, gain-and-Ioss computations made for 753 days <br />had a daily median loss of I ft3/s (table 3). Statistical <br />analysis, using a two-tailed t-test (Iman and Conover, <br />1983), was used to assess whether daily streamflow <br />gains and losses were significantly differeut from <br />zero during some seasons. A two-tailed hypothesis <br />test assumes that the difference can be greater <br />than or less thau zero. Results of the test using the <br />1984-92 estimated streamflow gaiu-and-Ioss data <br />indicated that only during the fall were daily gains or <br />losses in reach 2 significantly different from zero at <br />the 95-percent confidence level. <br />In addition to the more than 2,900 daily <br />computatious of streamflow gains and losses in <br />reach 2, boxplots are shown in figure 10 that <br />summarize streamflow gain-and-Ioss calculations <br />for more than 100 selected streamflow events between <br />1984 and 1992. Gain-and-Ioss computations for <br /> <br /> <br />8 winter streamflow events that were analyzed had a <br />daily median gain of 1 ft3/s; for 26 spring streamflow <br />events, a daily median gain of 1.5 ft3/s; for 48 summer <br />streamflow events, a daily median loss of 3.0 ft3/s; and <br />for 24 fall streamflow events, a daily median loss of <br />1.5 ft3/s (table 3). The streamflow-event estimates in <br />reach 2 ranged from a daily gain of 30 ft3/s to a daily <br />loss of 58 ft3/s (table 3). <br /> <br />Reach 3 <br /> <br />Analysis of daily mean streamflow gains and <br />losses for reach 3 was made for more than 3,200 days <br />between 1984 and 1992. A constant I-day advance <br />(traveltime adjustment) of the upstream flow, which <br />was based on a significant correlation between <br />upstream and downstream streamflow of 0.74 <br />(p=O.OOOI), was used in reach 3 for the computation of <br />daily streamflow gains and losses. Visual inspection <br />of many daily streamflow hydrographs for sites Q3 <br />and Q4 also indicated that a I-day advance of the <br />upstream hydrograph was an appropriate traveltime <br />adjustment when using daily streamflow data. The <br />boxplots of these calculated streamflow gains and <br />losses are shown in figure 11; a negative value <br />indicated a streamflow gain and a positive value <br />indicated a streamflow loss. Median values of stream- <br />flow gains and losses in reach 3 indicated a daily <br />streamflow gain during every season (fig. 11). <br /> <br />STREAMFLOW GAINS AND LOSSES 19 <br /> <br />J <br />