Laserfiche WebLink
<br />G () '2. I) <br />o ,. <br /> 10,000 <br /> 7,000 A . <br /> 5,000 ,. REACH 2 EXTENDS FROM SITES 02 TO 03 <br /> 4,000 n=31 <br /> 3,000 <br /> 2,000 . <br /> , . . <br /> 1,000 <br /> 700 . <br /> 500 .:tI- <br /> 400 . . <br />;;i 300 , . <br />0 200 <br />~ . <br />~ 100 . . <br />~ 70 . <br />'" 50 . <br />~o 40 <br />"-Z 30 . <br />=>8 20 <br />!;(w <br />;=(1) 10 <br />0'" <br />-'w <br />u.."- <br />::Eli; <br />Lilw 10,000 <br />",u.. <br />~~ 7,000 S <br />"Ill 5,000 REACH 3 EXTENDS FROM SITES 03 TO 04 <br />Lila 4,000 a- n =30 <br />"-~ 3,000 <br />(I) <br />=> 2,000 . <br />@ <br />z . <br />~ 1,000 <br />700 ." .. <br />~ 500 <br />~ 400 <br /> 300 .. .. <br /> 200 . <br /> . <br /> , . . <br /> 100 <br /> 70 .. . <br /> 50 . <br /> 40 <br /> 30 <br /> 20 . <br /> 10 <br /> 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 <br /> <br /> <br />TRAVELTIME TO DOWNSTREAM STATION, IN HOURS <br /> <br />Figure 7. Relation of traveltime to instantaneous peak ~treamflow for two reaches of the study area, <br />1990-94, <br /> <br />STREAMFLOW GAINS AND LOSSES <br /> <br />streamflow. For a specified stream reach, conserva- <br />tion of mass can be expressed with the following <br />equation: <br /> <br />Determination of streamflow gains and losses <br />requires an accounting of all surface water entering <br />or leaving specified river reaches; ideally, the <br />accounting is done during periods of relatively stable <br /> <br />Streamflow loss", RI + TI - DO - RO + dS <br /> <br />16 Evaluation of Streamflow Travaltlme and Streamflow Gelne and Losses along the Lower Purgatoire River, <br />Southeastern Colorado, 1984-92 <br />