Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0812 <br /> <br />establishing in-channel streamflow losses between the <br />Ninemile Canal [site Q3A (fig. 1)] and the Highland <br />Canal, a distance of about 32 river miles, that varied <br />from streamflow losses of 3 ft3 Is in winter to 8 ft3 Is <br />during summer. <br />A study by the Bureau of Reclamation (1964b) <br />reported that "it is generally recognized that natural <br />chaune110sses of the Purgatoire River are consider- <br />able" (p. 71) in certain reaches, and "the normal flow <br />of the Purgatoire River at Trinidad has very little <br />chance of reaching Alfalfa" (p. 72). The study <br />also reported that "fairly reliable loss rates can be <br />determined for 105 river miles" (p. 79) on water <br />transported between Alfalfa and the Highland Canal. <br />Channel losses were not estimated for river reaches <br />upstream from Alfalfa or downstream from the <br />Highland Canal because of the difficulty in estimating <br />diversions and return flows in these irrigated reaches <br />of the lower Purgatoire River. Generally, there were <br />few records of tributary inflow available for tl)e <br />analysis periods used in this study. <br />A more recent study (Colorado Department <br />of Natural Resources, 1975) attempted to determine <br />the amount of streamflow needed for downstream <br />deliveries to satisfy the senior water rights of the <br />Highland Irrigation Company, operator of the last <br />irrigation canal diverting from the lower Purgatoire <br />River. The study was conducted during summer, and <br />the riverbed was generally dry. Streamflow in the <br />Purgatoire River was regulated for several days using <br />bypasses at the Enlarged Southside Ditch, a large <br />canal near Trinidad that can divert a large percentage <br />of the available streamflow. Streamflow measure- <br />ments were made to determine conveyance losses <br />from Alfalfa to the Highland Canal. Following <br />several incremental increases to streamflow near <br />Trinidad, streamflow finally arrived at the Highland <br />Canal more than 16 days after the upstream releases <br />started. During this study, streamflow losses of <br />20 percent to more than 80 percent were indicated <br />in some river reaches (Colorado Department of <br />Natural Resources, 1975). <br />Another analysis of data from the study <br />described in the previous paragraph indicated that a <br />traveltime of approximately 5 days for water to flow <br />about 110 mi from Alfalfa to the Highland Canal was <br />more reasonable than the 16 days reported in the study <br />by the State (David E. Fleming, David E. Fleming <br /> <br />Company, written comrnun., 1975). Fleming <br />concluded that the 35 ft3 Is being supplied downstream <br />from Alfalfa in the first 10 days of the conveyance test <br />,was insufficient to result in measurable streamflow <br />!at the Highland Canal. Streamflow losses of about <br />i37 ft3/s were reported by Fleming along the 110 mi <br />lof river between Alfalfa and the Highland Canal. <br />Qazi and Krason (1976) reviewed and <br />analyzed many of the previous studies in the basin <br />land concluded that insufficient data were available <br />,to quantify streamflow losses along the lower <br />iPurgatoire River. Qazi and Krason (1976) concluded <br />!that (1) the irrigation season generally was a period of <br />'streamflow loss and the nonirrigation season generally <br />,was a period of streamflow gain in the river reaches <br />:from Trinidad (site Q1A) to Hoehne (site QIB) and <br />from Alfalfa (site Q 1 C) to the Ninemile Canal <br />(site Q3A); and (2) streamflow was observed to <br />'generally increase in the river reaches from Hoehne <br />ito Alfalfa and from the Ninemile Canal to the <br />iLas Animas streamflow-gaging station (site Q4). <br />i <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I Generalized Study Approach <br /> <br />A compilation of historical streamflow records <br />. collected by Federal and State agencies along the <br />,lower Purgatoire River was made for the purposes <br />of selecting data and time periods that could be used <br />to estimate streamflow traveltime and streamflow <br />gains and losses. Streamflow traveltime is the amount <br />of time it takes for a parcel of water to travel some <br />i known river distance downstream. Streamflow gains <br />and losses are the amount of water that is interchanged <br />between surface- and ground-water systems along the <br />river and are computed by subtracting all the surface <br />water leaving a river reach from all the surface water <br />entering a river reach. The review of available stream- <br />flow records indicated (1) mainstem streamflow data <br />along the lower Purgatoire River were available since <br />1895; (2) tributary streamflow data in the study area <br />were limited and available for only a few tributaries; <br />(3) the best continuity of tributary streamflow data was <br />for 1957-67 and 1984-92; (4) daily mean streamflow <br />and daily diversion data were available for both of <br />these time periods; and (5) hourly streamflow data <br />needed to evaluate streamflow traveltimes were <br />readily available after 1990. <br /> <br />6 Evaluation of Streamflow Traveltime and Streemflow Galne end Losses along the Lower Purgatoire River, <br />Southeastern Coloredo, f 984-92 <br />