My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09753
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09753
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:55:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:54:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1997
Title
Reviews of Sufficient Progress in Implementation of the Elements of the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative-Biological Opinion
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />High spring flows - completed <br /> <br />The BO also recommended: .... testing of low steady flows in summer and fall during low water <br />years. Information from final GCES endangered fish reports, researchers who conducted those <br />studies and other knowledgeable individuals are to be used to develop hypotheses and studies to <br />accompany those flows. Design of the experimental flows and associated studies will begin as <br />soon as possible and be targeted for completion by October 1996", The BO also recommended <br />the experimental flows begin in April, 1997, or altematively, if sufficient progress was not being <br />made in implementation of the RPA, they would begin April of 1998, The BO goes on to say that <br />implementation of low steady flows would occur in 8,23 maf water years. <br /> <br />Reclamation accepted the Service's recommended RPA in an April 6, 1995 response to the BO, <br />This letter of response indicated how Reclamation would implement the RPA. In this response, <br />Reclamation articulated that: 1) implementation of experimental flows are to be coordinated <br />through the AMP; 2) the flow experiments will include scientifically based peer reviewed criteria <br />to measure and evaluate their impacts on downstream resources; the research would be <br />managed and administered through the GCMRC; and that appropriate staff and funding levels <br />needed to be identified. This memorandum was distributed to all cooperating agencies and <br />interested parties. <br /> <br />To progress toward completion of this portion of this element of the RPA, the Grand Canyon <br />Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) has been established. Dr. David Garrett, as director <br />of the research center, and the program managers on his staff, have conducted multiple <br />meetings and formulated both a Long Term Research and Monitoring Plan (GCMRC, 1996) and <br />an Annual Plan (GCMRC, 1996) in cooperation with the transition work group members. These <br />plans are designed to evaluate the effects of the various flows regimes as called for in the <br />biological opinion (BO). <br /> <br />The description of the low steady flow in the BO was conceptual, based in part on the goal of <br />restoring a natural hydrograph to the extent possible under current conditions. Prior to <br />completing a plan for the research and monitoring of these flows, specific parameters must be <br />developed and submitted to the TWG and AMWG. The final description of these flows will be <br />subject to approval by the Service. <br /> <br />It has been Reclamation's intent to have in hand a report which integrates the research to date <br />on the fish in Grand and Glen Canyons. This work is underway through a competitive bid <br />contract let by Reclamation. Administration of this contract was transferred to the GCMRC in <br />keeping with Reclamation's plan to implement the RPA, as described above. However, the <br />Service recommended work on defining the specific flows occur simultaneously. A meeting was <br />held on October 29, 1997 to begin an informal discussion of the goals and conditions under <br />which this flow would be beneficial to the endangered fish. During this meeting it was reported <br />by a Reclamation hydrologist that 8.23 million acre foot years, which is one of the criteria for <br />conducting the low steady flow experiment, would not occur approximately one half the time as <br />reported in the EIS, but would actually occur much less frequently, Review of portions of the BO <br />and discussion with the Service led the group to conclude that if water releases were going to be <br />approximately 10,000 maf or less in any given water year, the goals of the low flow concept could <br />still be tested, Rather than basing criteria on a specific flow, the group agreed to pursue the <br />development of a general release pattem water years of 10,000 maf or less. The actual releases <br />would then be determined by the hydrology. A summary of the main points of discussion from <br />this meeting will be sent to the AMWG and TWG. <br /> <br />During the week of December 8, 1997. Low steady flows will not be implemented in 1998 as <br />called for in the opinion, because the forecast does not predict an 8.23 maf water year. The <br />opinion allows for implementation of the preferred altemative (ROD) in high and medium water <br />years, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.