Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~". <br /> <br /> <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Arizona Ecological Services Field Office <br />2321 W. Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 <br />Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 <br />In Reply Re," To: (602) 640-2720 Fax (602) 640-2730 <br /> <br />us. <br />nSH6WILDUI'1!: <br />SEIlVICE <br /> <br /> <br />AESO/SE <br />2-21-93-F-167 <br /> <br />April 3, 1997 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, Salt Lake City, Utah (Attn: C. Karas) <br />FROM: Field Supervisor <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Review of Sufficient Progress in Implementation of the Elements of the <br />Reasonable and Prudent Alternative from the December 21, 1994, Biological <br />Opinion on the Operations of Glen Canyon Dam <br /> <br />This is in response to your November 27, 1996, and subsequent March 13, 1997, letters to the <br />Fish and Wildlife Service which concluded that the Bureau of Reclamation has made sufficient <br />progress on the implementation of the December 1994 Biological Opinion. Your November 27 <br />letter also asked for our written view of this conclusion. The Biological Opinion requested an <br />annual meeting to coordinate reasonable and prudent alternative activities. One of the goals of <br />the meetings was to provide the Service an opportunity to detennine whether sufficient progress <br />is being made in accomplishing activities set forth to remove jeopardy to the listed species <br />impacted by the operation of Glen Canyon Dam. An evaluation of sufficient progress is difficult <br />to measure and subjective without established milestones or a schedule. Although varying <br />amounts of progress towards completion of the elements of the reasonable and prudent <br />alternatives have occurred, the Service is pleased with the direction of the implementation. We <br />address each element of the reasonable and prudent alternative as described in your letter. We <br />respectfully offer the descriptions of lack of sufficient progress in certain elements as a means <br />to re-focus activities for the next year. <br /> <br />1- Adaptive Management Program <br /> <br />The Record of Decision on the Glen Canyon Dam Environmental Impact Statement was signed <br />on October 9, 1996. The signing of the ROD fonnally adopted the preferred alternative <br />including the Adaptive Management Program. The Adaptive Management Plan includes an <br />Adaptive Management Work Group to facilitate the AMP, The Charter which establishes a <br />Federal Advisory Committee for the Adaptive Management Work Group was signed by the <br />Secretary of the Interior on January 15, 1997. These time consuming steps were necessary <br />procedures for the implementation of the Adaptive Management Program. The Service is <br />pleased that the process is continuing and looks forward to participation in the Adaptive <br />Management Work Group. <br />