Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1-4 <br /> <br />In addition to reviewing the information contained in Western I s Rate <br /> <br />Brochure, a detailed data request was prepared and submitted to Western. The <br /> <br />responses received to these data requests have been reviewed and considered in <br /> <br />preparing our analyses. When data request responses were not adequate, follow- <br /> <br />up data requests were made to Western. <br /> <br />Where appropriate, Western's data <br /> <br />responses are included, as appendices, as backup material for positions taken <br /> <br />in this report. <br /> <br />The review procedure also included attending and participating in the <br />Public Information Forum held by Western in Salt Lake City, Utah on November <br /> <br />16, 1982. At that Forum questions were asked of Western and Bureau of Reclama- <br /> <br />tion staff regarding the new CRSP rate increase proposal. The transcript of <br /> <br />that Forum and the answers to questions posed but not answered until a later <br /> <br />date have also been reviewed and considered in prepating our analyses. <br /> <br />We were also in attendance at the Public Comment Forum held by Western <br />in Salt Lake City, Utah on December 16, 1982. Comments were presented by CREDA <br /> <br />at that Forum. <br /> <br />The time period involved in the analysis of this rate proposal both in <br /> <br />terms of reviewing Western's proposal and associated backup material and in <br /> <br />formulating and preparing alternative studies was limited by Western's proce- <br /> <br />dural requirements. Therefore, complete, detailed analyses of all issues were <br /> <br />not performed. <br />