Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />" ) <br />0, <br />-J <br />. , <br />~. <br /> <br />Causes and Impacls of Salinity <br /> <br />EFFECTS OF WATER QUALITY ON WATER USERS <br /> <br />Economic <br /> <br />Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity of the <br />Colorado Rt\.er updated Ihe economic impacts of <br />salinity in the Colorado River Basin and <br />developed a melhod of forecasllng economic <br />impacts as salinity levels rise and water use <br />changes In the future (Lohman. et al.. 1988). <br />The first objective of Ihe slUdy was 10 update. <br />re\"be. clarify. and refine the estimales of <br />economic dJmages from salinil)' that had been <br />described in earlier studies (Anderson. el al.. <br />1978 and Kleinman. et al.. 1980). Figure 4 <br />shows Ihe relalive impacl of salinity on Water <br />users in (he Lower Colorado River Basin. The <br />srudy estinmed damages were 531 I million per <br />year based on 1976-85 salinity levels in Ihe <br />Lower Colorado River Basin and 1986 dollar <br />values. During this period. salinity averaged <br />767 mg/L at Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The second objective of the study was (0 <br />provide a bener means of estimating present <br />and future salinity damages through the <br />developmem of a comprehensive computer <br />program. While damages for 1976-85 were <br />estimated by the study to be S311 million per <br />year. as salinity levels increased to more nonnal <br />levels. damages (figure 5) will also increase. <br />SensirivIJY analysis using Ihe damage model <br />showed that damages (or the value of salinity <br />control) increase with salinilY <br />(U.S. Depanmem of the Interior. 1990). <br /> <br />- <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />0; <br />~ <br />~ <br />. <br />~ <br />e <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />E <br />~ <br />a <br /> <br />Salinity Costs by Sector <br /> <br />Crop (36%) <br /> <br /> <br />M&I(3%) <br /> <br />Household <br />(50%) <br /> <br />Management <br />(11%) <br /> <br />Figure 4. Sarlnlty costs by user group. <br /> <br />Damages vs Salinity <br /> <br />$20 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I ""-_M,""M"~'~, <br />[-~CCnl.""''''_ <br /> <br />'l5 <br /> <br />"0 <br /> <br />$05 <br /> <br />'8'97 ie_ <br /> <br /> <br />$0 <br />400 500 600 700 800 900 10001100 <br />Sabn<ty at Impenal Dam (m9ll) <br />FIgure 5,-Sallnlty damages Increase With salinity. <br /> <br />In 1997. the salinllY at Imperial Dam was 713 mg/l. Figure 5 shows (hat allhis level of salinil)'. <br />damages exceed 5500 million per year. As salinity approaches the salmity slandards levels <br />(879 mg/L at Imperial Dam). damages are projected to mcreas.e to about Sl billion per )'ear. <br />Withoul funher saliniry comrols to offset developmem. damages will increase another quaner of a <br />billion dollars per year. <br /> <br />Usinl:! J reJativeJv conservative analvsis. the bene fir of salinitv comrol was estlmaled 10 be <br />~. - . <br />S340 per ton (199-l dollar values). In comparison. the cost of saliniry control generally ranges <br />from S~O to SIOO per ton <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />