Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /><:) <br />o <br />Ut <br />.- <br /> <br />l <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br />TABLE 7.0 - TREATMENT AREA ID AND LOCATION, TREATMENT NAME, PRIORITY <br />RANKING, TREATMENT AREA UNIT OF MEASUREMENT, ESTIMATED ANNUAL SALT <br />SAVED AND COSTS FOR THE GREATER SAGERS WASH WATERSHED. GRAND COUNTY, <br />UT AH-CONTlNUED. <br /> <br />Treatmem T reatmenl Treatment Priority Treatment Annual Annual Annual Annua] <br />Area In Area Location Name Ranking A,.. Salt Salt Cost! CosllTOl1 <br /> Unit- Saved Saved acre of Salt <br /> (tonsl (Ions) (Sf.c) Saved <br /> acre) (S/loo) <br />TA-9 Sagers Wuh Contour Pits Low 900 .0637 57 6.01 94.40 <br /> and Cisco Pils <br /> 5-8. Zone <br />TA-IO Sagenl Contour Low 880 _0531 47 6.01 113.25 <br /> Pinto Pits and <br /> Wash Cisco Pits (160 acre .0531 9 6.01 113.13 <br /> Y Zone demo) <br />TA-II Nashl Cisco Piu Medium-2 6000 .0500 300 4.26 85.20 <br /> Sagers Maint. <br /> W..h S.8. Zone <br />TA-12 Sagen Wash Water Ve')' 24300 .0329 800 .73 22.19 <br /> Spreldcr'll Low <br />TA-13 Detention <br /> Du", <br /> Pinto Wash .80 Cancelled 7900 .0035 27 2.4 685.71 <br /> Pinto W..h .BI Cancelled 7900 .0044 35 1.62 368.18 <br /> Pinto W.1h .82 Cancelled 7900 .0042 33 2.4 571.43 <br /> Pinto Wuh .83 Cancelled 7900 .0030 24 1.37 456.67 <br /> Sagen Wish .ell!. Very Low 6784 .0047 32 .56 119.15 <br /> Sagers W.1h .Clb Very Low 4872 .0047 23 .56 119.15 <br /> Sagerl W..h .ele Very Low 3084 .0047 \4 56 119.15 <br /> Sagen Wash _Clf V cry Lo.... 5674 .0047 27 .56 119.15 <br /> Sagen Wuh .C3 Very Low 4995 .0047 23 .56 \\9.\5 <br /> Sagers W.ah .C4 Very Low 1912 .0047 9 .56 119.15 <br /> <br />.... Treatment Area Units arc; (.crea) for Treatmentl Areal T^-OthruTA.-ll. (linear feet) of di.ke for Treartmen\ Area TA.-12. and (cubic yard!>) <br />of earthfill for Treatment Area TA-13. <br /> <br />NOTE: Annual Salt Saved (tol1ll) for TA-l, TA-2. and TA-12 were calculated uaing data preaented i.n a memo by Mr, Alex D, E'i.in. 1976, <br />Thi. method of eatilNlting ..It ..ved wu determined to be more <<ccurate th.n the estima.teli calculated uliing the -RUSLE- equation. .ince the <br />date. presented in the Elkin memo war. from a study performed. in an area with identical aoi.ls to those found i.n the GtC&ter Sagen. W.sh <br />Watershed. <br /> <br />Annual Salt Saved. (tona) for TA-O. TA-3 thru TA-ll. and TA-13 were calculated. using the -RUSLE- equation and are not directly compalllble <br />to the Annual Salt Saved (tona) calculated uaing the data preaented in the Elkin memo. <br /> <br />39 <br />