Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 . Gunnison Country Times Thursday, November 25, 2004 <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />Basin of origin protection on hold <br /> <br />TOlli M, Todd <br /> <br />\/1 <br />o <br />~.,o <br /> <br />Water watchers ill the Gunni- <br />SOil Uasin dun't want to cash in <br />lheir political chipS jusl yel, as' <br />those. lcaucrs advised newly <br />r1ecled Colorado SlOle Represcn- <br />[arive Kathleen Curry against <br />proposing legislatiun aimed at <br />protecting basins from trans- <br />mountain diversions. <br />Curry reminded the board thaI <br />she has what she described as, <br />"....ery Hull". political l:apital" as a <br />freshman legislalor. <br />"1 want to use it wisely," she <br />said, asking her former bosses - <br />the board oC directors for Ihe <br />Upper Gunnisun River Water <br />Conservancy Di~Lrit:l - how she <br />could best represenl them in <br />. Denver. <br />She propo~cJ the ideOl or fo- <br />cusing more tllls year on the un- <br />going Statewide Waler Supply <br />Initiative (SWSI) and wailing a <br />year on bilsin of origin legisla- <br />tion. <br />"I agree with that," said UGR- <br />weD Board Member Ken Sp~nn. <br />"Take a year lO learn whom you <br />(an tr\\5t." . <br />"They're: luoking for it from <br />lIS," added UGRWCD Attorney <br />John McClow "It would be a big <br />mistake .for her to sponsor a <br />bas III of origin bilL" <br />As head of the House Agricul- <br />ture, Livestock aud Nalural Re- <br />sources Committee. Curry said <br />she is expected to "carry" certain <br /> <br />IV <br />fl <br />fl <br />:) <br />~ <br /> <br /><t' <br />:) <br />:) <br />" <br /> <br />:> <br />o <br />z: <br /> <br />bills. CUlT}' said she believes she <br />will be expected to mtroduce <br />some form of "basin of origin" <br />legislation. <br />Local resiuenl Ramon Reed <br />joined in offering words of cau- <br />lion. <br />"if you pass sOlilclhing (basin <br />uf origin legislation) that ducs <br />not incluue the word 'protection,' <br />it will hurt this basin," he said. <br />Curry said she has <l more <br />pressing concern. <br />"} Ihinl< there's a scrious issue <br />relaling tu lhe Colorado River <br />Compact, and rcg,udmg how <br />much entitlemcnt we (Colurado) <br />have lefl," she explaiued, "We're <br />going 10 go lhrough a whole lUI <br />(,.If brain damage on trans-basin <br />diversiun when lheres plObahl)' <br />not cvcn any water to diverL ex. <br />cepl in extremely WCI years." <br />The Colorauo River Compacl <br />is the forlll"l agreement between <br />the upper and lower Culorado <br />River .Basin slatcs that deter- <br />mines how much watcr each <br />slate gels each year from thc Col- <br />orado River ~nd iI's IriJlIIl~rics <br />The firsl SWSl reporl, wllleh <br />LOok 18~molllhs (0 compilc, ha~ <br />been complele:d. However, all ad- <br />ditional $500,000 may he infused <br />into lhe effUrl through nexl July <br />to focus on upportunities for <br />more trans-basin diversions from <br />the WeSlern Slope of Colorado to <br />the Front Range, <br />The UGRWCD has not been <br />plcasd with Ihe SWSl process, <br /> <br />"Tmns-Illountain diversiuns <br />shuultl not be the only lopic of <br />diseussion," said UGRWCD <br />Doard Member Steve Glazp.r. "If <br />we Ileed to inl'Tl'ase water use ef- <br />ficienc)' or find llew sUJ1pli~s, <br />Ihen we shuuld talk abOUI thaI." <br />UGR\VCD DirULOr Karell <br />Shirley described her disappOlnl- <br />ment with the entire SWSI <br />roumhablc uiscussion process m <br />gathering expert infurmatlun for <br />the re-porL She has said that (he <br />ruumhable meetings were 110t <br />open convt:rsations, but were <br />Powcr Point prcs~ntatitlns made <br />by SWSI facilitators, Tliey pru- <br />vided little opporlunUy for inpul. <br />When she and,Glazer attended <br />the most recent SWSI meeting, it <br />was slrm:lureu in such as way as <br />to solicit only pusilive feedback <br />from participants about the SWSI <br />process. <br />"It was discouraging," she said. <br />"'We (Steve and I) were the onl)' <br />ones giving negative feedback." <br />Shirley added, "We would not <br />aUlhorize use of funds wilhout <br />re-evaluating the process." She <br />suggested (hal if disulssiun~ <br />uccur over the next few monlhs, <br />they should be between and <br />among rill basins, nul just lhe <br />parries [0 likely trans-mouIllain <br />diversions. <br />Board member Spann s<\iJ, <br />"Make them accuunlable for the <br />muney. This lime, we need to <br />step up and ask, 'ex,ctly where is <br />lhe $500,000 gUlllg Iu go)'" <br /> <br />Shirley saiu she has heen ap~ <br />proached by Ihe CWCB, "They <br />would like mr-: 10 nH~cl with them <br />to discuss the process and ad- <br />Jress our concerns_" <br />"That's guod," responded <br />Curry, <br />"jt seems strange lhal the)' <br />want to change lhe process now, <br />after iL's over," t:~mmented board <br />member Diane Lothamer. <br /> <br />o <br />c:' <br />"""" <br />l-' <br />Q<:' <br />CiO <br /> <br />Curry got al1 informal OK <br />frum the UGRWCD hoard to <br />focus on the micro-management <br />of the SWS~ mOlley, resqlve Com. <br />pact issues and wait a year o.n <br />hasin.of origin legislation. <br />She vowed to take their sug- <br />gestions with her to' Denver in <br />her attempt to best. represenllhe <br />district. <br />. <br />