Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o 120% <br />" <br />:0; <br /><Il <br />5. 100% <br />0> <br />~ <br />~i <br />ltl t:: 80% <br />E 8- <br />. , <br />.~::- 60% <br />]g: <br />0- <br />~ 40% <br />o <br />t: <br />o <br />g. 20% <br />.t <br /> <br /> 12000 <br /> 10000 <br /> 8000 <br />" <br />u <br />c <br />~ 6000 <br />." <br />C <br />~ <br />.D <br /><( <br /> 4000 <br /> <br />estimates of the LCR Humpback Chub Population Age 2 Recruibnent <br />Proportional Decline for Each of Three Models <br /> <br />140% <br /> <br /> <br />~ Supertag <br />-.-Annual ASMR <br />-><- Monthly ASMR <br /> <br />0% <br /> <br />1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />EstImates of the LCR Humpback Chub Population Age 2 Recruitment <br />for Each of Three Models <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br /> <br />~ Supertag <br />-.- Annual ASMR <br />-><- Monthly ASMR <br /> <br />_e..~_~______.__ <br />. - <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 <br />Year <br /> <br />20021 <br /> <br />Figure 3 Estimates of recruitment (proportional decline and absolute abundance) from three <br />open population models. <br /> <br />Draft - April 21, 2003 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />