Laserfiche WebLink
<br />N <br />0') <br />,.... <br />o <br /> <br />farm ~nagement practices increases, crop production costs gener- <br /> <br /> <br />ally ipcrease accordingly. These increased costs attributed to <br /> <br /> <br />salinity adaptation can be considered as economic detriments. <br /> <br />The EP~ chose the yield decrement method to ,best represent the <br /> <br />agricu~ture damages associated with all the lower basin areas <br /> <br /> <br />and aS$umed no change in farm management practices, the amount <br /> <br /> <br />of watllr applied or the number of acres farmed. However, indi- <br /> <br /> <br />cation~ are strong that farmers will most likely adopt feasible <br /> <br /> <br />salinity adaptation practices rather than suffer yield losses or <br /> <br />reduce! acreage. Management practices which are or can be imple- <br /> <br />mented by farmers to mitigate salinity impacts are briefly reviewed <br /> <br />below: ' <br /> <br />1. :As salinity and water costs increase, ditch lining is almost <br /> <br />man~atory as a method of reducing seepage losses and alleviat- <br /> <br /> <br />ing;soil salinization. Land leveling is necessary for uniform <br /> <br />distribution of water and the prevention of salt buildup in high <br /> <br />spo~s in a ficld. <br /> <br />2. :Moldboard and slip plowing to depths of 4 to 6 feet are <br /> <br />pra4tical and result in improved drainage efficiency and more <br /> <br />uniform water penetration. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />.'71": <br /> <br /> <br />~"~lt ' <br /> <br />. .~, <br />~~- <br />.' ., <br />'. <br />