My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09662
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09662
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:55:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:48:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.120
Description
Colorado River Basin States Committee (AKA Colorado River Compact Commission)
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/15/1952
Author
CRBSC
Title
Proceedings of the Meeting of the Colorado River Basin States Committee
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />21 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />the water they wanted to and Arizona would9't have anything <br /> <br />to say about it." You may have somethin~ like that with <br />I <br />you states up here before you get through with it. <br />, <br />I <br />Let me say the Bureau officials ,n Washington appar- <br /> <br /> <br />ently don't agree with Mr. Coffey and they I think that the <br /> <br /> <br />states have got something to say about wheJe that water goes. <br /> <br />. i <br /> <br />But I think you are going to maybe sooner or later have to <br /> <br /> <br />kind of bac.k us up on that proposition, th~t the states have <br /> <br /> <br />got a right to say where the water that is jallocated to that <br /> <br /> <br />particular state is used, and that at least it is a compromise <br />, <br />I <br />proposition, a two-way proposition, and th~t the Federal Gover - <br /> <br /> <br />ment should never issue a contract to use Jhat stored water <br />I <br /> <br />except when it is approved by the state. I <br /> <br /> <br />Now that is the sum and substanCE of it. <br /> <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN STONE: That presents a very interesting <br /> <br />problem. I wonder if that isn't s, matter, based upon Mr. <br /> <br />I <br />Moeur's explanation of it, that we. shouldn'it look into; and ii <br />I <br />i <br />it is, is that a prOblem for the Upper Colorado River Commis- <br />sion or this Committee? <br /> <br />MR. WILL: <br /> <br />I just threw it out to you because we <br />I <br /> <br />you are going to have it sooner or later.. <br /> <br />May I say this--and I !Will admit, howeveI <br />i <br /> <br />MR. MOEUR: <br /> <br />have got it now and <br /> <br />that I am shooting rrom the hip--the problem is one that is <br />I <br />now immediatelY before Arizona and the Basin States Oommittee <br />I <br />it is not one with which we ourselves are immediately faced. <br />I <br />CHAIRMAN STONE: What do you meazl. by "we ourselves" <br />i <br />MR. WILL: I mean the Upper Color\ado River Commissi <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.