My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09662
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09662
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:55:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:48:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.120
Description
Colorado River Basin States Committee (AKA Colorado River Compact Commission)
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/15/1952
Author
CRBSC
Title
Proceedings of the Meeting of the Colorado River Basin States Committee
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />, <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />is where their major uses are? <br /> <br />'CHAIRMAN STONE: The only uses inj the Basin are Palo <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />Verde and one or two other small districts.1 <br />, <br />I <br />MR. MOEUR: But they have said on! several occasions <br />I <br />when we have confronted them with the fact :they are running <br />, <br />I <br />a lot of water into the Salton Sea, diverting more to the <br />I <br />I <br />Imperial Irrigation District than they can foSSiblY use, that <br />I <br />they are taking advantage of the fact that !the Upper Basin <br />I <br />cannot use it and they are leaching out the~r land. But I <br /> <br />think the leaching of the land is beneficia~ consumptive use; <br />I <br />if they divert it to leaoh the land and runl it into the Salton <br /> <br />Sea, I don't know but what that is a benefibial oonsumptive <br />I <br />use. It seems to me it is. I <br />I <br />, <br />MR. WILL: It is so far as the definition of oonsump <br />I <br />, tive use with respect to California is oonoerned. <br />I <br />MR. MOEUR: I don't think there would be any ques- <br />I <br />I <br />tion about it beoause there is no return f1pw. If they oould <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />1eaoh the land and throw it baok into the river again, that <br />I <br />would be a different story; but they are th~owing it into the <br /> <br />Sal ton Sea. <br /> <br />I think it might be well for you :beople to consider- <br />, <br />I <br />of course that is more an Upper Basin state$ deal than this <br />I <br />, ' I <br />Committee here--but I think it might be well to consider and <br /> <br />, <br />see what their answer is in this ease, if w~ get into oourt; <br />and then your a.ction will be guided by what that answer is. <br />MR. WILL: Of course the position of the Upper Colo- <br />rado River Commission has already been made clear in this <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.