My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09662
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09662
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:55:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:48:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.120
Description
Colorado River Basin States Committee (AKA Colorado River Compact Commission)
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/15/1952
Author
CRBSC
Title
Proceedings of the Meeting of the Colorado River Basin States Committee
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Q <br /> <br />is this'a new proposition? <br /> <br />CHAIRMAN STONE: <br /> <br />I <br />Well the State of Colorado and the <br /> <br />i <br />State of Wyoming has taken no action; neither has any other <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />state of the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />, <br />MR. TRACY: But in any contemplated action, didn't <br />I <br />we at the last meeting discuss that very thing and go into <br />I <br />that, and the State of Colorado and the St!j.te of Wyoming felt <br />, <br />, <br />that they wouldn't care to take any part in it? <br />CHAIRMAN STONE: I don't think a~y d~finite deCiSioi <br />was made. That discussion I believe, Mr.' tracy, took place ' <br />in the Upper Colorado River Commission whe~ the Commission I <br />adopted the resolution which'Mr. Will refe;red to this morn- I <br />, I <br />i <br />ing and under which he took the action in writing the Governo~ <br />II <br />, <br /> <br />of Arizona and California. <br /> <br />This Committee as such has never:taken any action <br />I <br />and the only action taken was the resolutidn of the Upper <br />, <br />, <br />Colorado River Commission which was taken-4when was that, Jeff <br />, <br />, <br />MR. WILL: That was June a year ~go. In fairness <br />I <br />to :Mr. TracY'Ithink this ought to be recalled, that during <br />I <br />the course of the discussion of the resolu~ion that was adopte <br />I <br />by the Commission at that time, Mr. Breite~stein discussed <br /> <br />the situation in which the respective stat~s found themselves; <br />, <br />, <br />and it became clear I think, that in his j~dgment, the validi <br />, <br />of the 1922 Compact could not be successfuily assailed unless <br /> <br />, <br />both Colorado and wYoming were before the Court, since both <br />, , <br />I <br />Colorado and Wyoming are parties to that Cqmpact. That there- <br />fore, if they were not before the Court, t~e validity of the <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.