Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br />I: <br />I <br /> <br />.- ~ . ('\ <br />'.L.i:... <br /> <br />excess was 134 acre-feet in August, or about 0.06 <br />percent of the August schedule. The record <br />augurs well for the effectiveness of the regulation <br />afforded by the Senator Wash project. <br />In 1967, about 66 percent of the total water <br />reaching Mexico was from the river above Im- <br />perial Dam, primarily from storage, and 34 per- <br />cent was from return Rows to the river below <br />Imperial Dam, and hence below the Senator <br />Wash control point. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Loan of Water to Mexico <br /> <br />During the latter part of August 1966 the <br />Departments of State and Interior announced <br />that in response to a request from the Republic <br />of Mexico, the United States had offered to loan <br />Mexico 40,535 acre-feet of Colorado River <br />water to assist farmers in the Mexicali Vallev <br />during an emergency in which according to <br />Mexican authorities many acres of crops ,,,ould <br />be lost unless an emergency supply of water were <br />forthcoming, The loan of the water was made <br />contingent upon the following three conditions: <br />I. If the May I, 1967, forecasted spring run- <br />off of the Colorado River dropped below the <br />long-term average of 8.5 million acre-feet, the <br />loan would be repaid out of Mexico's treaty al- <br />lotment of 1,500,000 acre-feet during] 967. <br />2. If the forecasted runoff for 1967 exceeded <br />the long-term average, the 40,535 acre-feet of <br />water would be repaid over a three-year period. <br />3. Mexico would reimburse in dollars the <br />United States for any decrease in power genera- <br />tion at either Hoover or Glen Canvon Dam <br />powerplants caused by the loss of p~wer head <br />resulting from the release of the 40,535 acre-feet <br />from storage. <br />In reporting to the Board on August 31, 1966, <br />the Chief Engineer pointed out that the State of <br />California was not advised, nor had the matter <br />been referred to the Committee of Fourteen rep- <br />resenting the seven Colorado River Basin States, <br />in advance of the loan. <br />The Board agreed, after discussion, to request <br />the Committee of F ollrteen to seek an explana- <br />tion of the facts by the U.S. Commissioner of the <br />International Boundary and Water Commission <br />concerning the loan of water to Mexico before <br />the Board considered what course of action <br />should be taken. <br />At a meeting of the Committee of Fourteen <br />in Las Vegas, Nevada, on November 28, 1966, <br /> <br />I <br />L <br /> <br />it was reported by both State and Interior De- <br />partment representatives that the situation was <br />not likely to be repeated in the future, but that <br />the Secretary of the Interior had acted within <br />his authority under the Reclamation Project Act <br />of 1939, and that such release was not in violation <br />of the Mexican Water Treaty of 1944. <br />At the twenty-third annual meeting of the <br />Colorado River Water Users Association at Las <br />Vegas, Nevada, December 1-2, 1966, Mr. Cole <br />introduced the following resolution which was <br />endorsed and adopted by the Association: <br /> <br />Resolution Re: Mexican Water Treaty <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on August 23, 1966 it was announced <br />by the Departments of State and Interior that the <br />United States has offered to loan Mexico 40,535 <br />acre-feet of Colorado River water in addition to <br />the quantity required to be delivered at the Inter- <br />national Boundary under the terms of the Mexican <br />\Vater Treaty; and <br />WHEREAS, the offer was made by federal offi- <br />cials without prior consultation with officials of <br />the Colorado River Basin States; and <br />WHEREAS, it is in the interest of international <br />comity to render assistance to the Republic of <br />J\1exico in an emergencr, it is at the same time <br />only fitting that responsible officials of the Colo- <br />rado River Basin States be consulted in advance <br />of an action which affects or may affect the rights <br />of the citizens of those states; <br />Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the <br />Colorado River Water Users Association urge the <br />federal Departments and officials to advise and <br />consult with the propet and responsible officials of <br />the Colorado River Basin States before entering <br />into agreement or taking action with regard to <br />delivery of Colorado River water to Mexico if <br />such agreement or action is not expressly provided <br />for by the terms of the Mexican 'Vater Treaty. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this <br />resolution be fotwarded to the Secretaries of State <br />and Interiorj to the Governors of the seven Colo- <br />rado River Basin States; and to the Congressional <br />Representatives of the seven Colorado River Basin <br />States, <br /> <br />In the early months of calendar year 1967 the <br />1966 loan to Mexico of waters amounting to <br />40,535 acre-feet was repaid by Mexico, by re- <br />duction of that amount in the scheduled deliv- <br />eries in 1967, to a total of 1,459,465 acre-feet. <br />Incident to the loan there was a loss of head and <br />power revenue at Glen Canyon Dam amounting <br />to $6,623.37, and this amount has been paid by <br />Mexico to the United States Department of the <br />Interior. <br /> <br />35 <br />