|
<br />i
<br />I:
<br />I
<br />
<br />.- ~ . ('\
<br />'.L.i:...
<br />
<br />excess was 134 acre-feet in August, or about 0.06
<br />percent of the August schedule. The record
<br />augurs well for the effectiveness of the regulation
<br />afforded by the Senator Wash project.
<br />In 1967, about 66 percent of the total water
<br />reaching Mexico was from the river above Im-
<br />perial Dam, primarily from storage, and 34 per-
<br />cent was from return Rows to the river below
<br />Imperial Dam, and hence below the Senator
<br />Wash control point.
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />Loan of Water to Mexico
<br />
<br />During the latter part of August 1966 the
<br />Departments of State and Interior announced
<br />that in response to a request from the Republic
<br />of Mexico, the United States had offered to loan
<br />Mexico 40,535 acre-feet of Colorado River
<br />water to assist farmers in the Mexicali Vallev
<br />during an emergency in which according to
<br />Mexican authorities many acres of crops ,,,ould
<br />be lost unless an emergency supply of water were
<br />forthcoming, The loan of the water was made
<br />contingent upon the following three conditions:
<br />I. If the May I, 1967, forecasted spring run-
<br />off of the Colorado River dropped below the
<br />long-term average of 8.5 million acre-feet, the
<br />loan would be repaid out of Mexico's treaty al-
<br />lotment of 1,500,000 acre-feet during] 967.
<br />2. If the forecasted runoff for 1967 exceeded
<br />the long-term average, the 40,535 acre-feet of
<br />water would be repaid over a three-year period.
<br />3. Mexico would reimburse in dollars the
<br />United States for any decrease in power genera-
<br />tion at either Hoover or Glen Canvon Dam
<br />powerplants caused by the loss of p~wer head
<br />resulting from the release of the 40,535 acre-feet
<br />from storage.
<br />In reporting to the Board on August 31, 1966,
<br />the Chief Engineer pointed out that the State of
<br />California was not advised, nor had the matter
<br />been referred to the Committee of Fourteen rep-
<br />resenting the seven Colorado River Basin States,
<br />in advance of the loan.
<br />The Board agreed, after discussion, to request
<br />the Committee of F ollrteen to seek an explana-
<br />tion of the facts by the U.S. Commissioner of the
<br />International Boundary and Water Commission
<br />concerning the loan of water to Mexico before
<br />the Board considered what course of action
<br />should be taken.
<br />At a meeting of the Committee of Fourteen
<br />in Las Vegas, Nevada, on November 28, 1966,
<br />
<br />I
<br />L
<br />
<br />it was reported by both State and Interior De-
<br />partment representatives that the situation was
<br />not likely to be repeated in the future, but that
<br />the Secretary of the Interior had acted within
<br />his authority under the Reclamation Project Act
<br />of 1939, and that such release was not in violation
<br />of the Mexican Water Treaty of 1944.
<br />At the twenty-third annual meeting of the
<br />Colorado River Water Users Association at Las
<br />Vegas, Nevada, December 1-2, 1966, Mr. Cole
<br />introduced the following resolution which was
<br />endorsed and adopted by the Association:
<br />
<br />Resolution Re: Mexican Water Treaty
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, on August 23, 1966 it was announced
<br />by the Departments of State and Interior that the
<br />United States has offered to loan Mexico 40,535
<br />acre-feet of Colorado River water in addition to
<br />the quantity required to be delivered at the Inter-
<br />national Boundary under the terms of the Mexican
<br />\Vater Treaty; and
<br />WHEREAS, the offer was made by federal offi-
<br />cials without prior consultation with officials of
<br />the Colorado River Basin States; and
<br />WHEREAS, it is in the interest of international
<br />comity to render assistance to the Republic of
<br />J\1exico in an emergencr, it is at the same time
<br />only fitting that responsible officials of the Colo-
<br />rado River Basin States be consulted in advance
<br />of an action which affects or may affect the rights
<br />of the citizens of those states;
<br />Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the
<br />Colorado River Water Users Association urge the
<br />federal Departments and officials to advise and
<br />consult with the propet and responsible officials of
<br />the Colorado River Basin States before entering
<br />into agreement or taking action with regard to
<br />delivery of Colorado River water to Mexico if
<br />such agreement or action is not expressly provided
<br />for by the terms of the Mexican 'Vater Treaty.
<br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this
<br />resolution be fotwarded to the Secretaries of State
<br />and Interiorj to the Governors of the seven Colo-
<br />rado River Basin States; and to the Congressional
<br />Representatives of the seven Colorado River Basin
<br />States,
<br />
<br />In the early months of calendar year 1967 the
<br />1966 loan to Mexico of waters amounting to
<br />40,535 acre-feet was repaid by Mexico, by re-
<br />duction of that amount in the scheduled deliv-
<br />eries in 1967, to a total of 1,459,465 acre-feet.
<br />Incident to the loan there was a loss of head and
<br />power revenue at Glen Canyon Dam amounting
<br />to $6,623.37, and this amount has been paid by
<br />Mexico to the United States Department of the
<br />Interior.
<br />
<br />35
<br />
|