Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3030 <br /> <br />reconnaissance level. The significance of wetlands impacts by changes to Ft. Lyon Canal operations, <br />if any, must be reviewed on the ground by agency personnel on a case by case basis. <br /> <br />The extensive irrigation and return flows, both underground and surface affect the Arkansas River <br />channel ecology. In addition to sustaining river channel wetlands, the return flows bring nutrients <br />to the river fishery. The river bottom-lands are home for the full range of plains wildlife. The river <br />bottom-lands provide recreational, fishery, and scenic benefits to the community. <br /> <br />3.11 Aesthetics <br /> <br />Prior to the canal construction, the area of the Ft. Lyon system was undoubtedly the same arid, high <br />plains as now exist north of the canal. Close to the river there would have been typical plains river <br />bottom ecology. As early as 1898 the Colorado State Engineer advocated state promotion of <br />irrigation systems because of multiple benefits to the beauty of the land as sell as to its productivity. <br />The construction of the irrigation ditches, laterals, and reseIVoirs would result in seepage which <br />would nourish fruit, ornamental and other trees and shrubs. <br /> <br />Since the construction of the Ft. Lyon system, stately cottonwoods parade along the ditch, and <br />congregate where the waters are available. Farmsteads have planted evergreen and deciduous <br />vegetation for wind protection, to control soil erosion and for scenic purposes. The typical plantings <br />of grasses, alfalfa, corn and wheat supported by irrigation make the countryside bloom and remain <br />green nearly year round. <br /> <br />3.12 Water Oualitv <br /> <br />Water quality in the lower Arkansas River generally deteriorates as it travels downstream primarily <br />due to the use and reuse of the water supplies for agricultural purposes. Average dissolved solids <br />loading and water quality data at stream gauge stations on the Arkansas River are presented in <br />Figure 3.2. While state water quality standards are not applicable to ditch systems, standards do exist <br />for lakes, including Adobe Creek and Horse Creek ReseIVoirs, John Martin ReseIVoir, and the Great <br />Plains ReseIVoirs. Standards also exist for the Arkansas River mainstream and its tributaries in the <br />Ft. Lyon area. The Current classifications which have been established by the Colorado Water <br />Quality Control Commission are: <br /> <br />Arkansas River: Recreation Class 2, Aquatic Warm Water Class 2, <br />Water Supply, and Agriculture <br /> <br />Horse Creek: Recreation 2, Aquatic Warm 2, Agriculture <br /> <br />Horse Creek ReseIVoir: Recreation 2, Aquatic Warm 1, Agriculture <br /> <br />Adobe Creek: Recreation 2, Aquatic Warm 1, Agriculture <br /> <br />3-16 <br />