My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09648
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09648
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:46:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co Limestone Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
2/1/1994
Author
Gronning Engineering
Title
Ft Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3012 <br /> <br />2.6 Factors Contributing to Water Sales <br /> <br />The gradual movement of water from ruraVagricultural areas to urban/municipal and industrial areas <br />results from several general factors, most of which are not unique to southeastern Colorado. <br /> <br />1. Water is a property right and is severable from the land. <br /> <br />2. Farming is always hard work, fraught with high risk of financial failure or small <br />return on investment. <br /> <br />3. Farming income is sometimes less than the return on investment of water sale <br /> <br />proceeds. <br /> <br />4. Agricultural incomes are not growing, especially among family farmers. (Keene. <br />Osborn 1992) <br /> <br />5. Some farmers are failing and need or want to sell. <br /> <br />6. Agricultural capital availability is limited. <br /> <br />7. Urban populations are growing while rural, agricultural communities are not growing <br />or are declining in population. <br /> <br />8. Municipal and industrial users wish to obtain firm water supplies for drought years. <br /> <br />9. Farming accounts for most of the water consumption in the state, but accounts for <br />only a part of the population, political base and economy of the whole state. <br /> <br />10. There are insufficient young farmers interested in taking over farms; and, the major <br />capital investment required disqualifies many potential entrants. <br /> <br />11. Rural communities and farmers may be ambivalent or undecided on the position to <br />take on a possible water transfer. This may be a result of a desire to retain the <br />option for sale of their water as security for the future. <br /> <br />12. If a transfer occurs, farmers may not want to be "left behind", fearing greater <br />operating problems, higher expenses, and the loss of neighbors and traditional <br />community lifestyle. <br /> <br />13. There are accepted legal processes for the transfer of water and resolution of at least <br />some of the issues arising from a proposed transfer. <br /> <br />14. Cost of protecting water rights and protesting water transfers is relatively high for <br />rural communities and farmers. <br /> <br />2-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.