My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09641
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:45:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
3/9/1976
Author
Steinhoff and Ives
Title
Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the San Juan Mountains - Colorado - March 9 1976
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />","<j?'i; <br />'J 'J!,...J:- I ;J <br /> <br />CHAPTER III <br />RESEARCH HETIlOOS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Y <br /> <br />Nel Caine 1/. Jane H. Bock. Bnd H. W. Steinhoff <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />This chapter Is ~ poat-facto evaluatIon of the San <br />Juan Eco!Oty Pto~e~t (SJ~~) !nt~nded to ~eet the con- <br />tractua.l requirement to "develop a methodology for <br />continuing ecological impact studies elsewhere." It <br />benefits from the separate evaluation of research <br />needs in assessing the environmental impact of <br />snowfall augmentation made recently by Cooper et al. <br />(1974). We outline the research and administrative <br />procedures used in SJEP and indicate those that were <br />found useful, 88 well as others that were noC so <br />useful. The chapter also includes brief consider- <br />ation of research topics that were not included in <br />the project but which now seem of greater impor- <br />tance than they did in 1970, at the inception of <br />the San Juan Ecology Project. One objective of this <br />evaluation is to make the eXgerienr-e of SJEP inves- <br />tigators available to ecologists concerned with the <br />impacts of snowfall augmentation in other areas. <br />We do not intend to construct a set of guidelines <br />to constrain other researchers since work at other <br />~imes and places will probably involve different <br />problems than those faced in SJEP. <br /> <br />The San Juan Ecology Project was subject to a number <br />of constraints. Some of these derive from its <br />geographic and historical context and are bound to <br />influence an internal evaluation of the project. <br />Therefore, it is useful at the outset to summsrize <br />the important controlling features of SJEP. <br /> <br />I. The project was intended to evaluate the poten- <br />tial impacts of snowpack augmentation produced <br />by cloud seeding over a wide mountain area. <br /> <br />2. The target area of'cloud seeding, ~here <br />ecological work was concentrated, was un- <br />developed. The populated area of the western <br />San Juan Mountains was removed from the target <br />area before seeding stsrted in 1970 (Figure 1. <br />Chapter 1). ~ithin the target area defined at <br />that time, there was no resident population and <br />only one all-season road. A large part of the <br />area 1s now (1976) designated wilderness within <br />the Weminuche Wilderness. <br /> <br />3. The increase in snowfall was predicted to be <br />15 percent during the pilot study and would be <br />30 percent under operationsl cloud seeding. Any <br />increase would be imposed on a natural snawpack <br />with high annual variability. <br /> <br />4. Only selected terrestrial ecosystems were <br />studied in the project. <br /> <br />5. The level of funding throughout the life of the <br />project was about $200,000 per year. <br /> <br />6. The research was conducted through local <br />(Colorado) institutions: University of Colorado <br />(CU); Colorado State University (CSU); snd <br />Fort Lewis College (FLC). <br /> <br />II In Steinhoff, Harold W. and Jack D. Ives (Eds.) 1976. <br />San Joan Mountains, ColoTado. Final Report, San Juan <br />Fort Collins. <br />!I Present Address: <br /> <br />7. The research group had not previously worked <br />together as a team. <br /> <br />In evaluating the experience gained in SJEP. three <br />scales af consideration are used here. First, over- <br />all project operation and administration are con- <br />sidered. Second are comments on the general <br />approaches to environmental research which are <br />applicable to this kind of impact evaluation. <br />Finally, more specific research procedures and <br />reco~ndations make up the last part of the chapter. <br />The final section includes only those procedures <br />which apply to a number of different subprojects in <br />SJEPi approaches without this level of generality <br />are left to the individual reports of Chapter IV. <br />Hore detailed discussion of some of the topics in- <br />troduced in the last part of this chapteT can also <br />be found in the subproject reports of Chapter IV. <br /> <br />MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH <br /> <br />Since 2nvironmental research involves scientists from <br />different disciplines with varying interests, ad- <br />ministrative problems of cooperation and coordination <br />often occur. These problems may be minimized when <br />all re6earchers are from the same institution or <br />have worked together previoosly; however. the San <br />Juan Ecology Project did not have either of these <br />advantsges at its inception. The project was con- <br />ducted through three university-type institutions. <br />This separation resulted in fiscal and political <br />tension in the early days of the project and had a <br />continoing influence on its administration. SJEP <br />never experienced a single, central authority; <br />instead. the project was operated through a coordi- <br />nator, ~wo team leaders. and a steering committee. <br />The problems Bssociated with the administrative <br />structore discussed here are the administration <br />of SJEP. project planning and priorities. and <br />scientific cooperation. <br /> <br />The results of a questionnaire administered to .SJEP <br />investigators snd administrators in mid-1975 by <br />Dr. Douglas A. Benton and Dr. Jsmes R. Meiman of <br />ColoradO State University are widely used in this <br />chapter (NSF grant NM-~44-11 to Dr. D. A. Benton).* <br />Benton and Heiman made tabulated results from the <br />questionnaire responses available to USi the inter- <br />pretation and eVBluation of the results made here <br />are our own responsibility. To Buit present needs. <br />the sequence of questions has occasionally been <br />changed and this may account for some apparent <br />inconsistency in the results. The tabulated <br />responses to the questionnaire summarize subjective <br />perceptions of the project beld by the personnel <br />working on it. Nevertheless. there is often a <br />surprising level of consensus in the responses. <br /> <br />*A sample questionnaire is included as Appendix A <br />to this chapter. <br /> <br />Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the <br />Ecology Project. Colorado Stste University Publ.. <br /> <br />INSTAAR, University of Colorado. Boulder, Colorado <br /> <br />80309. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.