Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Clr;? ';7 <br />D J t. ~ J <br /> <br />afternoon thunderstorm activity. Evapotranspiration <br />1s quite large during July, August, and September. <br />Average daily summer precipitatiDn over the watershed <br />of the Animas River, as measured at Silvereon, Electra <br />Lake, Tacoma, and Durango, needs to be greater than <br />6.4 rom to produce a response in stream flo~. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The net yield in runoff from summer rainfall is quite <br />small compared ~lth the net yield from ~inter precipi- <br />tation. Hean annual specific yield of water runoff <br />from the major portion of the study area is ~bout SOD <br />mm, with spring (April-July) runoff 3.5 to 4.5 times <br />greater than runoff during the remainder of the year. <br />There is a sharp gradient between the geographic areas <br />which collect enough precipitation to produce an <br />annual runoff yield of 254 em per unit area and the <br />areas from which less than lS mID of runoff occur. <br />RunQff characteristics of the area were investigated <br />by Morel-Seytoux (1968) and Grant (1969). The latter <br />repQrt includes detailed information on snowpack run- <br />off, streamflow trends for the past 60 years, and in- <br />vestigation of flood potential from snowmelt. <br /> <br />Ve~etation <br /> <br />The variety in climate, soils, and physiography has <br />produced a Bpectrwrn of vegetation types. In the upper <br />elevations of the alpine tundra, vegetation is often <br />intruded by bedrock outcrops. Below timberline, <br />spruce-fir stands and aspen Bta~ds are intermingled <br />with open meadows and Gambel oak communities. The <br />lower elevations are primarily timbered with exten- <br />.sive stands of ponderosa pine and Gambel oak. U.S. <br />Forest Service Township Maps (1961-1963) provide some <br />information on habitat, while Krebs (this vol., p. 81) <br />has pr?duced detailed maps for much of the area. <br /> <br />Three study areas were located within the spruce-fir <br />forests and two in the upper elevations of the alpine <br />tundra (Fig. I, p. 3). The detailed studies of the <br />tundra ecosystem under varying snow conditions were <br />concentrated in the lo1illiams Lakes and Eldorado Lake <br />basins. Forest ecosystem research projects were pri- <br />marily conducted on Missionary Ridge, with additional <br />investigation on ~olf Creek Pass and at Rico. For a <br />detailed description of each study area see the Intro- <br />ductions to the tundra and forest ecosystems. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND OF CLOUD SEEDING fOR THE SAN JUAN ECOLOGY <br />PROJECll1 (W. Howell, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) <br /> <br />When winter snowstorms sweep over the San Juan Moun- <br />tains, not all of the moisture that condenses in the <br />form of clouds above the mountains falls as snow. <br />Much of it remains in particles too small to fall. <br />Carried beyond the mountains by the wind to where the <br />airflow sinks once more toward the plains, these par- <br />ticles re-evaporate. The rate ar which snow reaches <br />the ground, expressed as a proportion of the rate at . <br />which moisture condenses In the cloud, is called the <br />efficiency of precipitation. <br /> <br />It has been found that in some storms, especially <br />those having relatively deep cloud systems with cloud- <br />top temperatures below about -27 C, the precipitation <br />efficiency tends to be relatively high, and in such <br />situations there is li~tle that the current knowledge <br />of weather modification could do to increase the snow- <br />fall. In weak storms that condense very little mois- <br />ture. there is likewise little potential for stlmula- <br /> <br />tion. However, it has been fOUlld that when the <br />clouds a~e deep enough and active enough to condense <br />relatively large amounts of moisture but the cloud <br />tap temperature is warmer than about -26 C. seeding <br />of the clouds with artificial ice nuclei often raises <br />the precipitation efficiency fron a rather low value <br />to one typical of the colder clouds. Under these <br />particular conditions, cloud seeding has the poten- <br />tial of substantially increasing the rate of precipi- <br />tation, probably by as much as a hundred percent. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Basin Pilot Project was designed <br />as a statistical test of the capability of the cloud <br />seeding technology of 1971 to bring about precipita- <br />tion increases. When the weather forecasters expected <br />scormcloud conditions considered favorable for seeding <br />within a twenty-four hour period beginning at 11 A.~. <br />(and if established safety criteria were met), an <br />"exp.:!rimental day" was declared. A randomized deci- <br />sion then was made whether the experimental day would <br />be seeded or left unseeded as a control. Th~ e~peri- <br />ment was intended to run for four consecutive winters <br />and accumulate 160 experimental days about equally <br />divided between seeded and unseeded. It actually <br />ran for five winters and accumulated 71 seeded and 76 <br />unseeded days. <br /> <br />It was thought that the snowfall on seeded days might <br />~xceed that on unseeded experimental days by about 15 <br />percent and possibly up to 30 percent, and that ex- <br />perimental days might account for as much as half of <br />the season's snowfall. This would have corresponded <br />to a maximum precipitation increase of about 7.S per- <br />cent for the season as a whole. Although evaluation <br />is not yet complete, preliminary results indic~le <br />that no such sizable overall increase was reali7.ed. <br /> <br />There appear to have been many "unseeded" days imme- <br />diately following seeded days when silver iodide <br />smoke, trapped in the valleys upwind of the mountain <br />range, affected the clouds and effectively caused <br />these days to be seeded. On other days strong ..inds <br />carried the seeding effect over the mountain ~rest <br />and outside the study area. On ~till other day&, <br />designated as "seeded," the silver iodide failed for <br />one reason or another to reach the clOuds. Qn still <br />other occasions the forecast of favorable conditions <br />waS unfulfilled or else fulfilled for only a portion <br />of the 24-hour period, so that any seeding effect was <br />greatly diluted. <br /> <br />Hevertheless there exists an identifiable subset of <br />experimental days, free from these disturbing influ- <br />ences. for which substantial snowfall increases <br />could be identified with a high degree of confidence. <br /> <br />The tentative conclusions from the project character- <br />ize it as a limited success. It revealed serious <br />weaknesses of the 1971 technology in the methods used <br />to identify "seedable" occasions and to place the <br />seeding material in the desired place at the desired <br />time. It failed also to giVe a reasonably accurate <br />measure of the potential of cloud seeding for in- <br />creasing the seasonal precipitation. On the other <br />hand, it furnished additional e.vidence that the under- <br />lying principles are sound and that prescnt weakness <br />has to do mainly with the practical difficulties of <br />effective application. <br /> <br />During the five winter seasons of the Pilot Project, <br />320 kg of silver iodide, containing lq7 kg of silver, <br /> <br />!I The San Juan Ecology Project did not include studies of the techniques of cloud seeding, but to set the stage <br />for the remainder of this volume, we asked the Bureau of Reclamation to provide an overview of the cloud <br />seeding acti vi ties, which tlley considera tely prov ided. <br /> <br />5 <br />