Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />~~ :~0: SECWCD <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />-:; <br /> <br />1-4 <br />~ <br />~ <br />CJl <br /> <br />REPAYMENT CONTRACT STATUS <br /> <br />TotaIP.y~...ta$S7,tS1.30' <br /> <br />P_yTao. <br />1391W.03J <br /> <br />199'P.ymenta$.4.33&.139 <br />f>_~T.. <br />S3.:lOO~ <br /> <br /> <br />_'7320,089 <br /> <br /> <br />OIrw$<l8JJ6!;O <br /> <br />The abovt:' charts show payments the District has made to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation toward repayment oi reimbursable <br />costs of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. The chart on the right retlects payments of $4,335,539 to the Bureau during calendar <br />year 1998 from all revenue sources including property taxes ($3.200.538), Project Water sales ($645.341) and other payments <br />1$489,660). <br /> <br />Property tax payments are from the District's ad valorem tax collections designated for repayment oi Ihe fry.Ark Project which <br />represent 95% oi the District's latal properly la, colleclions. All revenues from annual Project Water allocations (S7.00 per acre-foal) <br />are transferred directly to the Bureau. In previous ye.1rs. all revenues from \Vinter Water storage charges have been transferred <br />directly to the Bure.1u. The District had no 1998 Winter Water storage revenues because of the Bureau's Saiety of Dams water-level <br />restriction in effeCl at Pueblo Reservoir. Other payments are direct remJUances to the Bureau for use of Fry-Ark Project facilities by <br />various water users for storage and delivery of non-prOject water and are also credited to the repayment oi Project debt <br /> <br />The chart on the left shows total payments 10 the Bureau since the 1981 Repayment Contract was signed by the District Re- <br />flected in the chart are total payments of 557.95 1,301 irom all revenue sources Including property taxes (539.' 99,033), Project <br />Woller sales ($9,104.7431, Winter Water storage charges ($2,327,436) and other payments (S7.JlO.089). <br /> <br />The Repayment Contract requires that revenues first be applied to annual operation and maintenance COSIS. then to Municipal <br />and Industrial (M&I) interest, next to M&l debt obligation. and lastly to Irrigation debt obligation. Total payments. 1982 through <br />September 30, 1998, are 557,951,301 and have been applied as follo....s; 0&1\\ costs ($ 11,044,' 80), interest ($27,506,285), and <br />debt obligation pavments of S 19,400,836 including M~r"r (S 15,565,8(9) and Irrigation ($3,834,957). <br /> <br />Based upon the Buteau's Final Co'" Alloratlon of Prolect Con"'ruc!ion Costs (1993) and Co'" and ReDa"ment Schf'dule (1996) for <br />the Fry-Ark ProJect, the District's total rep.1yment obligatIon (e\duding Fountain Valley Authority Pipeline) amounted to S 132.237,478 <br />mcluding 557.888.485 ior MO.l and 574,348,993 for Irrigation, After applvmg the debt obligation payments mentioned above, <br />the remaining unpaid balance at September 30, I 998 is $112,836.642 (,\.t&1 $...2,322,606; Irrigation $70,51...,036). (Buteau's <br />199i and 1998 Repavment Summaries are currently undergoing revle", by Bureau staff.) <br /> <br />Beginning Balance, 1982 <br />le5S: Pa"ment5 (FFY 198:! - 1998) <br /> <br />.\1&1 <br />57.888,485 <br />15,565.879 <br /> <br />Irrigation <br />7",,3...8,993 <br />3,8H,957 <br /> <br />Tolal <br />132,237,478 <br />19,400.836 <br /> <br />Ending Balance, Sep. 30.1998 <br /> <br />42.322,606 <br /> <br />70,514,036 <br /> <br />112.836,6..\2 <br /> <br />15 <br />