Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />. . . DRAFT . . . <br /> <br />UCRBCOM~ 12 FEB 85 <br /> <br />The subcommittee is aware that certain ~9neral concerns about the modeling <br />effort cannot be addressed in the hypothesis-testing format used above. <br />Nevertheless, those concerns are considered by the subcommittee to be of great <br />importance to this critlque o~ the overall modeling effort. Those concerns are <br />stated here. for review by the Coordinating Committee: <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL CONCERN 1: The objectives of the interagency modeling ef~ort need <br />further clarification and important benchmarks (against which progress can be <br />guagedl need to be developed. The Biotechnical Subcommittee believes that the <br />recovery plans for the endangered Colorado River fiShes, as well as the <br />Colorado River Endangered Fishes Recovery Team. should be part of this process. <br />Is the objective to maintain populations at present level? To increase <br />populations to some other level? What do we mean by .preservation?" It is <br />evident that preservation of the species means different things to different <br />people. Establishment of realistic objectives would help to eliminate this <br />confusion. This would require agreement on the meaning of important terms that <br />have been frequently used in the interagency effortl the term "recovery" and <br />associated terms are good example. <br /> <br />RECOI'IMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />23 <br />