Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OCT-08-96 11.23 FROM.M.B.S.S. <br /> <br />10.970 247 8827 <br /> <br />PAGE 16/18 <br /> <br />CJ <br />(0 <br /> <br />procedures. The difference between current revenues <br /> <br />c' <br />c <br /> <br />a.nd t.he new' lower requirement for repayment would go <br /> <br />to the Upper Division states. <br /> <br />b. A uniform surcharge of 5 mils per kilowatt hour <br />would be imposed upon a.ll purchases of CRSP power. <br /> <br />c. A differential su=charge would be imposed upon the <br /> <br />purchasers of CRSP power in ea.ch sta.te, which <br />surcharge could vary from state to state (a 5 mil <br />per kilowatt hour differential surcharge is proposed <br />for Colorado customers). <br /> <br />2. These revenues would be collected annually (subject to <br /> <br /> <br />the conditions and l~tations descrioed' below in the <br /> <br />section entitled .Use, and Disposition of Power <br />Revenues.) oy the Western Area Power Administra.tion <br /> <br />(WAPA) and would be in addition to the revenues needed <br /> <br />for the repayment of the storage units and completed <br />participat.ing projects, the operation and maintenance of <br /> <br />the same, and the costs of salinity control projects. <br /> <br />3 . Revenues so collected would be paid by WAPA to the Upper <br /> <br />Division states annually. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />- <br />