Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FIGURES-Continued <br /> <br /> 21. <br />~,~ <br />t.n <br />eM 22. <br />~() <br /> 23. <br /> <br />Histograms showing the IPSr values of oil-field brine and of water from the upper Paleozoic <br />and Navajo aquifers, in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah .................... 75 <br /> <br />Graph and map showing the relation of ground-water movement to 087Sr value of water samples <br />collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah...................................... 76 <br /> <br />Map and graph showing the relation of 087Sr value of water from the Navajo aquifer to that of <br />water from the upper Paleozoic aquifer, in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan <br /> <br />County, Utah ....... ............. ........ ............ ..... ...... .............................. ............... ......................... ............. 79 <br /> <br />24. Dendrogram and map showing the relation of hierarchical cluster analysis to wells completed <br />in the Navajo and upper Paleozoic aquifers and to oil-field brine samples, in and near the <br />Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah............................................................................... 81 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />1. Records of selected wells and springs in the Navajo and other aquifers in and near the <br />Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah ............................................................................... 22 <br /> <br />2. Analytical methods, reporting units, and minimum reporting levels for chemical constituents and <br />physical properties analyzed in water samples collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, <br />San Juan County, Utah, ] 989-94................................................................................................... 31 <br /> <br />3. Most probable standard reference water values for selected major- and trace-element <br />constituents compared with the values for standard reference water samples submitted with <br />samples collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah, <br />November] 992 to September 1994................................................................................................... 33 <br /> <br />4. Chemical analysis of selected minor- and trace-element constituents and physical properties from <br />blank samples transported to and from the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan Counry, Utah, <br />November 1992 to April 1994 ........................................................................................................... 34 <br /> <br />5. Chemical analysis of selected major-, minor-, and trace-element constituents from blank samples <br />processed on site in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah, <br />November 1992 to September 1994................................................................................................... 35 <br /> <br />6. Chemical analysis of selected minor- and trace-element constituents and physical properties <br />from duplicate samples collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, <br />Utah, November 1992 to September 1994......................................................................................... 36 <br /> <br />7. Selected physical properties and major- and minor-chemical constituents in surface- and ground- <br />water samples and precipitation samples collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, <br /> <br />San Juan County, Utah ....................................................................................................................... 38 <br /> <br />8. Selected trace-element constituents and isotope values in surface- and ground-water samples and <br />precipitation samples collected in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah.... 52 <br /> <br />9. Percentage of injection water determined from the ot80/0D isotopic mixing model compared <br />with measured and calculated chloride concentration in water from selected wells completed in <br />the Navajo aquifer in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah........................ 73 <br /> <br />10. Percentage of injection water determined from selected 1587Sr isotopic mixing models compared <br />with measured and calculated chloride concentration in water from selected wells completed in <br />the Navajo aquifer in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field, San Juan County, Utah........................ 78 <br /> <br />11. Data set ANETH used in multivariate statistical analysis ................................................................. 82 <br /> <br />v <br />