My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09541
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:42:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USGS
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1996
Author
USGS
Title
Hydrology/ chemical quality/ and characterization of salinity in the Navajo aquifer in and near the Greater Aneth Oil Field - San Juan County - Utah
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />t..,) flowing artesian wells in the study area varies substan- <br />c.n tially and is not monitored. Measured discharge from <br />CJl individual flowing wells during the study, however, <br />C ranged from less than I to about 150 gallmin. <br />Most water used for domestic and stock purposes <br />outside of communities on the Navajo Indian Reserva- <br />tion is withdrawn by wells powered by windmills (fig. <br />5). Windmills were constructed beginning in the 1940s <br />to provide power to pump freshwater for families who <br />lived far from communities where freshwater was <br />avai lable. Depending on location and depth, wells <br />equipped wirh windmills yield water from the Dakota <br />Sandstone, the Morrison Formation (including the <br />Bluff Sandstone Member), and the Entrada, Navajo, <br />and Wingate Sandstones. Generally, windmills pump <br />less than 5 gallmin of water and operate intermittently. <br />The volume of water pumped by windmills from bed- <br />rock aquifers is not monitored and thus is unknown <br />(Michael Johnson, Navajo Water Resources Manage- <br />ment Department, oral commun., 1994). Although <br />most water pumped by windmills is fresh (dissolved- <br />solids concentration less than 1,000 mglL), the water is <br />not approved by Navajo regulatory agencies for drink- <br />ing-water use; hence, families in outlying areas must <br />haul water from approved wells. An additional source <br />of freshwater for outlying areas is derived from wells <br />equipped with hand pumps (fig. 6). These wells gener- <br />ally are located in washes and yield warer from alluvial <br />deposits at shallow depths. The volume of water <br />yielded by hand pumps is also unknown but is rela- <br />tively small compared with yields from other sources in <br />the study area. <br />Drinking-water supplies for the communities of <br />Bluff, Montezuma Creek, and Aneth are obtained from <br />wells. Water from public-supply wells in Bluff is <br />derived from the Wingate and Navajo Sandstones. In <br />198 I, pumpage from municipal wells in Bluff was <br />about 34.1 acre-ft (Hooper and Schwarting, 1982, p. <br />55). Water from three public-supply wells in Monte- <br />zuma Creek is pumped from the Bluff and Entrada <br />Sandstones. Average usage from these three wells for <br />the period January 1990 to January 1995 was about 94 <br />acre-ftlYL Drinking water for Aneth is pumped from <br />two deep wells completed in the Bluff Sandstone about <br />6 mi north of Aneth and then piped to the community <br />for distribution. Average usage from both wells from <br />January 1990 to January 1995 was about 82 acre-ftlYL <br />In addition, water from two wells completed in the <br />Navajo Sandstone between the communities of Bluff <br />and Montezuma Creek is used in natural gas operations <br />by Elkhom Operating Company. During the 1991-92 <br /> <br />and 1994 calendar years, withdrawal from these wells <br />averaged about 138 acre-ftlyr (Gene Gruette, Elkhorn <br />Operating Company, written commun., 1995). <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC SETTING <br /> <br />The hydrologic system in the vicinity of the <br />Greater Aneth Oil Field consists of Paleozoic and <br />Mesozoic rocks that contain sandstone aquifers and <br />interbedded shaly confining units (fig. 3). The San Juan <br />River is the principal discharge area for the aquifers in <br />rocks of Mesozoic age in the study area. The stratigra- <br />phy and associated hydrologic units of San Juan <br />County, including the Aneth area, have been described <br />by Avery (1986) and Howells (1990). <br /> <br />Surface Water <br /> <br />The San Juan River is the principal base-level <br />stream in the study area, into which all surface drainage <br />flows either directly or indirectly (fig. I). Discharge of <br />the San Juan River has been regulated at Navajo Reser- <br />voir in northwestern New Mexico since 1962; hence, <br />river discharge is substantially influenced by reservoir <br />releases, which depend on precipitation in the drainage <br />basin. Records of stream discharge from the U.S. Geo- <br />logical Survey streamflow-gaging station at Mexican <br />Hat, Utah, about 20 mi west of the study area, indicate <br />that the mean daily discharge for the 1992-94 water <br />years ranged from 528 ft3/s (August 1994) to 7,123 ft3/s <br />(June 1993) (ReMillard and others, 1993, 1994, and <br />1995). Stream discharge also is influenced by inflow <br />from McElmo Creek, snowmelt and thunderstorm run- <br />off, withdrawals from the river for irrigation and indus- <br />trial use, and losses from evapotranspiration. <br />The only perennial tributary to the San Juan <br />River in the study area is McElmo Creek (fig. I). <br />McElmo Creek has its headwaters in Colorado but dis- <br />charges into the San Juan River at Aneth. Records of <br />stream discharge from the U.S. Geological Survey <br />streamflow-gaging station at Aneth indicate that mean <br />daily discharge for water year 1982, the last period of <br />record, ranged from 23.4 ft3/s ro 211 ft3/s (ReMillard <br />and others, 1983, p. 230). Discharge of McElmo Creek <br />is influenced by irrigation return flows that contribute <br />to peak flows in late summer (Avery, 1986, p. 17) that <br />likely prevent McElmo Creek from being an ephemeral <br />stream in its lower reaches. <br />Most of the study area is drained by ephemeral <br />streams. The largest ephemeral streams are Monte- <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.