Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RESOUROE DEVElLOPME:NT PROGRAMS <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />. .~-. -.- . ::>.: ..~';.:;~-->".;;;;, "- .; ~ <br />~;~})p~{D~'t't<i~~;~<,~ <br /> <br />"':'::. '.:::~i~__' "," ">'-....,. .'.' '..;':- <br />~. . ',' .,>-/ "; :'~~":':;~')-~~~:'-~::c.'> <br /> <br />~;f~f} <br />WATER <br /> <br />002400 <\'~\ <br /> <br />involving an earth work of 247 crore cubic feet. (Which is 2 billion 470 million <br />cubic feet of earth, the. Indian unit crore equaling 10 million.) That is every <br />day 3 crore (30 million) cubic feet were done. There was no machinery and the <br />entire earthwork including excavation, transport, and tamping was done by <br />human labor amounting to 13 lakhs of men (which is 1,300,000 men the Indian <br />unit lakh equaliinglOO,ooO). <br />The finished work is neat and the canal is functioning efficiently. Such speed <br />of construction of earthwork on canals has not been achieved anywhere even <br />with the help of mecJ1anical equipment * * *. <br /> <br />. Konwar Sain goes on to five similar reports on earth dams, concrete <br />dams, sluices, and regulators, compares them with parallel Indian <br />construction and concludes: <br /> <br />In India, where similar human force is available, it should be possible to. <br />attain similar speed with respect to canal systems by proper organization of" <br />enthusiasm amongst the people. <br />Konwar Sain's Chinese and subsequent Russian assignments were <br />not dissimilar to this study, but he naturally reported on the relation- <br />ship of the Indian river program to those of the Communist leaders <br />and made Indian comparisons. While obviously there is no "similar <br />human forc~ ~vailable" .for. canal digging in the United States, an.d <br />the prereqUIsIte "orgamzatIOn of enthUSIasm among the people" IS <br />not noted, still a dIrect relationship between the North Kiangsu <br />Canal Chinese performance and an American endeavor can be <br />reported. <br /> <br />','<' : ".'.- <br />,.,::..>. .~:~ " <br /> <br />. :::. ;:.':-.J":;.- <br /> <br />GREATER THAN ALL-AMERICAN CANAL <br /> <br />The nearest equal United States canal to the North Kiangsu works <br />may be the All American Canal bUilt by the Bureau of Reclamation <br />in southern California. The All American Canal is smaller on all <br />specifications. The California canal is 80 miles long; Kiangsu is 106. <br />miles. All American's bed width is 160 feet; Kiangsu's is 420 feet. <br />~ll American's ini~ial capacity is 15!155 ~mbi~ secon~ ~eet; Kia~g~u's <br />IS 25,000c. s. f. Klangsu's purpose IS primarIly to Irrigate 4 mIllIon <br />acres and All American's is primarily to irrigate the Imperial Desert, <br />and both have secondary multiple purpose benefits. The Chinese. <br />dug Kiangsu in 80 days. <br />The United States dug All American in 5 years and 4 months be- <br />tv:een 19!34 and 1940. Approximately 1,300,000 Qhinese dug Kia~gsu <br />WIth then' hands, shovels, and buckets. ApprOXImately 11500 Umted <br />States citizens dug All American with all the huge machmery in the. <br />way of draglines, bulldozers, carryalls, diesel trucks, and belt con- <br />veyors available. Costs in different monetary units are uncomparable,. <br />unavailable, and meaningless. In both instances as Sain, who has. <br />seen both canals built, re~orts "the finished work is neat and the canal <br />is functioning efficiently.' That is the best actual case history devel- <br />oped responSIve to the. request to report pertinently. on "the relative <br />slZe, scope, and velOCIty of these programs," and. how they were. <br />accomplIshed. . <br />Such vast amounts of hard labor as were utilized on the Kiangsu <br />are unavailable in the United States now, considered undesirable, <br />and also against the law at anything like the Chinese equivalent wage. <br />The questIOn naturally arises as to how they can be mobilized any- <br />where and whether or not the Chinese army goes out, rounds them up,. <br />and marches them to work by force. It appears instead that in Com- <br />munist China, where vast unutilized manpower is available, the mobi- <br />