My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09505
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:40:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8543.200
Description
Projects in the Closed Basin
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
11/1/1957
Title
Data Relative To Operation Of Rio Grande Compact (1940-1956)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- 3 - <br /> <br />requir8lllellts. New Mexico's total deliveries have been about 535,000 acre feet <br />less than scheduled. Colorado over-delivered in onl;r 3 of ths 14 years. Hew <br />Mexico made over-deliv8l'Y" in only 4 years during the period. <br />During the four consecutive years of' subnormal stream flows, 1953- <br />1956, Colorado's under-deliveries amounted to a total of' about 197,000 acre feet <br />while the total of' Hew Mexico's under-deliv1eres was 72,000 acre feet. <br />It appears that so far as the Colorado schedules are concerned, a <br />few ;years of large over-delivery are required to off-set a long series of' years <br />of' under-delivery. Also, that two or more conseetttive dry" years ma,y result in <br /> <br />large under-deliveries in a following year of relative1;lr high runoff. This situ- <br /> <br />ation was not apparent in records of inflow and outflow prior to the CoIIIpact. <br /> <br />Debit and Credit Computations <br />.As previous:Qr stated, in the 17 year period since the Compact be- <br />came in e:t'fect, total deliveries at the Lobatos gage have been 123,000 acre feet <br /> <br />in excess of the total scheduled am:>unts. <br /> <br />Due to the limitation ot 150,000 acre feet on credit for arq year, <br />80Jle 60,000 acre feet of over-delivery would have been lost in 1942 even though <br />Elephant Butte had not spilled. However, since there actuall;rll'as a spill, that <br />;yearl,y credit of 150,000 acre feet was loat, together with an additional. 127,000 <br />acre feet of accrued credit. <br /> <br />llT the end of 19119, Colorado had an accro.ed c:redit of 144,700 acre <br />feet although total over-delivery to that date was about 184,000 acre feet. The <br />difference represented evaporation losses in Elephant Butte which were charged to <br />Colorado under provisions of the Com.pact. In 1950, due to drOllght conditions, <br />Colorado relinquished 60,000 acre feet of credit water to project storage, and <br />after being charged with an evaporation loss, still had a credit of' 25,000 acre <br /> <br />r ..,...... ,-.- .<0, . <br />. ~,'. - . <br />u\. ..,..~-~v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.