My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09503
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/10/1962
Author
CWCB - D. Hamburg
Title
Mexican Water Treaty Negotiations Pertaining to the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I ~ <br /> <br />On June 17-20, 1942, at El Paso, Texas, the committee of <br />sixteen passed a resolution embodying a formula for allocation of <br />Colorado River water. The formula provided that a given amount of <br />water should be made available at the border to Mexico on the basis <br />of releases from Boulder Dam. The Committee was later advised that <br />the formula would not be acceptable to the Mexican Government and it <br />would be useless to proceed on that basis. <br /> <br />At a meeting held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, on April 14-16, <br />1943, the Department of State submitted a formula for delivery of <br />water to Mexico. This formula was approved by five of the states, <br />with Nevada not voting and California voting against said formula. <br />Subsequently on January 27-28, 1944, at a meeting in Salt Lake <br />City, Utah, the Department of State reported the salient features <br />of the treaty which had been negotiated with Mexico but which had <br />not yet been signed. The actual treaty itself was not given to <br />the committee. At this meeting the five states again expressed <br />views that the salient features of the treaty were more acceptable <br />than those features they had approved at the Santa Fe meeting. <br />California again opposed the proposal and Nevada agreed. No <br />formal action was taken as it was the agreement of the committee <br />that unless unanimous approval could be obtained the states would <br />go their separate ways. <br /> <br />Subsequently in July, 1944, at Santa Fe, New Mexico, <br />the five states supporting the treaty had a meeting with the repre- <br />senatives of the State of Texas and the Six States Committee was <br />then formed. This organization was formed for the purpose of <br />uniting support for the ratification of the treaty. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS OF TREATY PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />Article 1 <br /> <br />Definition of Terms - This article defines certain terms <br />which are used in the Treaty. <br /> <br />Article 2 <br /> <br />The Commission and Its Jurisdiction - This article continues <br />the previously created commission and renames it the International <br />Boundary and Water Commission. The commission is given the status <br />of an international body, consisting of a United States section <br />and a Mexican section and the article provides that the settlement <br />of all disputes to which its observance and execution may give rise <br />are entrusted to the International Boundary and water Commission. <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.