Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t , <br /> <br />canal permits delivery of water to California lands entirely <br />through American territory and thus free of any Mexican control. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Compact was signed at Santa Fe on <br />November 24, 1922. While it is not within the purview of this <br />paper to discuss that Compact suffice it to say for the purposes <br />of the Compact, the Colorado River is divided into an upper basin <br />comprising the drainage area above Lee Ferry and a lower basin <br />comprising the drainage area below that point. The States of <br />Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming form the upper division <br />for the purpose of the application of the provisions of the Com- <br />pact and the States of California, Arizona and Nevada form the <br />lower division. The Compact was ratified by six states, including <br />California,and the California Legislature passed an act agreeing <br />to the limitation of California uses as described by the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act. Subsequently, in 1944, Arizona ratified the <br />Compact. <br /> <br />The Boulder Canyon Project Act was approved by Congress <br />on December 21, 1928, and pursuant to it contracts for the gener- <br />ation and disposal of hydroelectric power to be generated at <br />Boulder Dam and contracts for the use within the Lower Basin of <br />the waters to be impounded at Boulder Dam were negotiated from <br />time to time in conformity with the provisions of the act. Pur- <br />suant to the provisions of the act, Boulder Dam, the Imperial <br />Diversion Dam, and the All-American Canal were constructed. <br />Boulder Dam, with an original total capacity of about 31,000,000 <br />acre-feet, was completed in 1935, and the Imperial Dam and the <br />All-American Dam were completed and placed in operation early in <br />1942. <br /> <br />NEGOTIATIONS WITH MEXICO <br /> <br />In 1924 the Congress passed an act authorizing the <br />President to designate three special commissioners to cooperate <br />with representatives of Mexico in a study regarding the equitable <br />use of the waters of the Rio Grande below Fort Quitman, Texas. <br />Mexico was unwilling to discuss the Rio Grande unless, at the <br />same time, the problem of the Colorado River was also discussed. <br /> <br />By joint resolution approved March 3, 1927, the scope <br />of the investigation provided for by the Act of May 13, 1924, <br />was extended so as to include the Colorado River and the resolu- <br />tion specifically provided that the purpose was to secure informa- <br />tion on which to base a treaty with Mexico relative to the use <br />of the waters of the two rivers. permission was also granted to <br /> <br />-4- <br />