Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SENATOR DOWNEY. The language you refer to, as I <br />understand you, is this: That Mexico shall be guaranteed <br />the right to l,500,OOO acre-feet of water from any and <br />all sources; is that right? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. That is part of the language. <br /> <br />SENATOR DOWNEY. That is the language you refer to? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. Yes; that is correct. <br /> <br />SENATOR DOWNEY. Is not that a clause favoring Mexico <br />and merely providing that her lien or right to 1,500,000 <br />acre-feet attaches to all the waters in the United States? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. No, sir. As I say, I participated in the <br />negotiations and I know the reason for that language. As <br />to subsequent interpretations, I do not know. But I know <br />the reason for the language. <br /> <br />Then, do not forget the very significant limitation: <br />"for any purpose whatsoever". <br /> <br />SENATOR DOWNEY. Do you have the treaty there? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. Yes, sir. <br /> <br />SENATOR DOvffiEY. Read that last language that you <br />think obligates Mexico to take water even though it is <br />not of usable quality. <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. It is article 10, subparagraph (b), on <br />page 14: <br /> <br />Mexico shall acquire no right beyond that pro- <br />vided by this subparagraph by the use of the waters <br />of the Colorado River system, for any purpose what- <br />soever, in excess of 1,500,000 acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />SENATOR DOWNEY. But, Mr. Tipton, that does not answer <br />the question as to whether that 1,500,000 acre-feet is to <br />be usable as first-class water. That begs the whole <br />question. <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. No, it does not, Senator. If Mexico re- <br />quired an additional amount of fresh water to dilute this, <br /> <br />-29- <br />