My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP09503
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
WSP09503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:54:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 3:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/10/1962
Author
CWCB - D. Hamburg
Title
Mexican Water Treaty Negotiations Pertaining to the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Lower Yuma country if we are not careful, why, that land <br />may become water-logged by the irrigation of all this <br />water on these lands, which will have a return flow down <br />toward that country. <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. Yes, sir. <br /> <br />SENATOR McFARLAND. We may have to pump water, may we <br />not, in order to keep it from water-logging? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. You are pumping water now. <br /> <br />SENATOR McFARLAND. We are pumping it now? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. Yes, sir. <br /> <br />SENATOR McFARLAND. But we may have to pump it a <br />whole lot more? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. I am not so sure of that, Senator. I <br />think you are maintaining your salt balance--yes. You <br />won't have to pump more, because you are pumping more <br />than sufficient to maintain the salt balance. We assume <br />under the so-called ultimate conditions it will only <br />require 120,000 acre-feet to maintain the salt balance, <br />so I do not believe that your drainage problem would be <br />any more acute, except to the extent that the irrigation <br />of the mesa lands under the Gila project might accentuate <br />the need for drainage. <br /> <br />SENATOR McFARLAND. Well, I did not want to go into <br />that question right now, but what I was getting at is <br />that under that provision of the treaty Mexico could <br />not complain if we did pump water and put it in the <br />river, and they had to use it? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. NO, sir. <br /> <br />SENATOR McFARLAND. It would still be water? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON. That is correct." <br /> <br />~ottom of P. 323 to bottom of P. 324: <br /> <br />"SENATOR DOV1NEY. Mr. Chairman, this question, I think, <br />is of so much importance I would like to pursue it a <br /> <br />-27- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.