Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />r;/f9J <br /> <br />Salinity Control by Canal Lining: <br />The McElmo Creek Unit, Colorado <br /> <br />W. Martin Rochel <br />John W. Davison2 <br /> <br />INTRODU crION <br /> <br />The McElmo Creek Unit is a Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) sa- <br />linity control investigation located in southwestern Colorado and is <br />part of the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program (CRWQIP), <br />a program to reduce salinity in the Colorado River. The unit was autho- <br />rized for study by Public Laws 93-320 and 96-375 to determine the most <br />cost effective means of reducing an annual average of 119,000 tons <br />(108,000 metric tons) of salt from entering the San Juan River, a tribu- <br />tary of the Colorado River, from the McElmo Creek Drainage. The result <br />of salt loaded by the McElmo Creek Drainage measured at Imperial Dam, <br />California, is approximately 12.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L). Imperial <br />Dam is a location where standards of water quality, measured in mg/L of <br />total dissolved solids, have been established in 1972 by the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Forum and approved by the Environmental <br />Protection Agency. <br />The unit area is defined as the McElmo Creek Drainage and lies pre- <br />dominantly in Montezuma County, Colorado (Figure 1). Several alterna- <br />tives have been formulated to reduce salinity within the unit area and <br />have included evaporation of saline water at various locations within <br />the unit area, selectively withdrawing saline agricultrual lands, de- <br />salting flows from McElmo Creek, using saline flows for industrial pur- <br />poses such as coal slurry or cooling towers at nearby coal-fired gener- <br />ating plant, improving on-farm irrigation management, draining aquifers <br />storing saline groundwater, and improving the Montezuma Valley Irriga- <br />tion Company's (MVI) irrigation distribution system by lining or combin- <br />ing canal sections. <br />Selection of a recommended plan was based upon a comparison of the <br />alternatives using cost effectiveness as the primary consideration. <br />Cost effecciveness is measured by dividing the annual cost to construct <br />and operate an alternative for its useful life by the annual reduction <br />of salt measured in mg/L. The alternatives also had to meet public ac- <br />ceptance and comply with legal and institutional regulations to be <br />complete. Results of the comparison indicated that improvements to the <br />MVI irrigation distribution system was the best plan. <br />Currently, Reclamation is completing its planning report for the <br />McElmo Creek Unit. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />lChief, Division of Planning, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Durango, <br />Colorado, X., ASCE. <br />2Study Coordinator, Plan Formulation Branch, U.S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation, Durango, Colorado <br /> <br />Ot:~155S <br />